Where Did I Go Wrong in Deriving Gravitational Potential Energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of gravitational potential energy using Newton's law of gravitation. The user attempted to derive the work done by gravitational force using vector calculus but encountered an error that resulted in an incorrect factor of three in the final expression. The mistake was identified as an incorrect application of the differential in a multi-variable context, specifically in the substitution step. The correct approach involves recognizing that the differential of a multi-variable function requires the inclusion of all variables in the derivative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's law of gravitation
  • Familiarity with vector calculus
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in multiple dimensions
  • Basic principles of gravitational potential energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of vector calculus in physics problems
  • Learn about the correct use of differentials in multi-variable functions
  • Review the derivation of gravitational potential energy from first principles
  • Explore advanced integration techniques relevant to physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of gravitational potential energy derivation.

Dead Boss
Messages
150
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Derive the gravitational potential energy from Newton's law.

Homework Equations



<br /> \mathbf{F} = -G \frac{m_1m_2}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3} \mathbf{r}<br />

<br /> W = \int_A^B \mathbf{F} \cdot{} d\mathbf{r}<br />

<br /> \Delta{}U = W<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I can use the scalar version of the law, but I want to do it with the vector form.
So, first some easy substitution:

<br /> W = \int_A^B \mathbf{F} \cdot{} d\mathbf{r} <br /> = -Gm_1m_2 \int_A^B \frac{\mathbf{r}\cdot{}d\mathbf{r}}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3}<br /> = Gm_1m_2 \int_A^B \frac{r_xdr_x + r_ydr_y + r_zdr_z}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3}<br />

<br /> = -Gm_1m_2 \left\{<br /> \int_A^B \frac{r_x}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3} dr_x +<br /> \int_A^B \frac{r_y}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3} dr_y +<br /> \int_A^B \frac{r_z}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3} dr_z<br /> \right\}<br />

Now take one integrand, for example the x part,

<br /> \int_A^B \frac{r_x}{\sqrt{r_x^2 + r_y^2 + r_z^2}^3} dr_x =<br /> \int_A^B r_x \left( r_x^2 + r_y^2 + r_z^2 \right)^{-\frac{3}{2}} dr_x<br />

and perform substitution:

<br /> t = r_x^2 + r_y^2 + r_z^2<br />
<br /> dt = 2r_x dr_x<br />
<br /> \frac{dt}{2} = r_x dr_x<br />

That yields:

<br /> \frac{1}{2} \int_A^B t^{-\frac{3}{2}} dt_x =<br /> \left[ -t^{-\frac{1}{2}} \right]_A^B =<br /> \left[ -\frac{1}{\sqrt{r_x^2 + r_y^2 + r_z^2}} \right]_A^B =<br /> \left[ -\frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|} \right]_A^B =<br /> -\left( \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|} \right)<br />

Doing the same for other two integrands and plunging them back:

<br /> W = -Gm_1m_2 \left\{<br /> -\left( \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|} \right)<br /> -\left( \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|} \right)<br /> -\left( \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|} \right)<br /> \right\}<br />

And finally

<br /> W = 3Gm_1m_2 \left(<br /> \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|}<br /> \right)<br />

Now if we take B at infinity, the potential energy will be

<br /> U = - 3G\frac{m_1m_2}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|}<br />

which is three times as large as it should be. Don't tell me, let me guess. There's an error somewhere up there. *sigh*
Any help would be highly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is where you were wrong:
<br /> <br /> dt = 2r_x dr_x<br /> <br />

t is a multi-variable function, therefore: dt = 2r_xdr_x+2r_ydr_y+2r_zdr_z

A suggestion: 2\vec{r}d\vec{r} = d(\vec{r}^2) = d(r^2)
 
Thanks, hikaru!
I knew I should have read that book about multivariable calculus.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K