Where did the minus sign come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edwardy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sign
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the presence of a minus sign when presenting vector components in the third quadrant. It explains that both components of vector F_A, denoted as F_{Ax} and F_{Ay}, are negative due to their direction in the third quadrant. The angle θ made with the positive x-axis is expressed as θ = 180 + α, leading to negative sine and cosine values. There is a clarification that while vector components can be negative, the magnitudes themselves are conventionally positive. The distinction between vector direction and magnitude is emphasized as critical for accurate representation in physics.
Edwardy
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I need to present Fay and Fax using Fa and cos(a) and sin(a). I seem to be missing a minus, why?
Relevant Equations
None
IMG_20221009_124258.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edwardy said:
Homework Statement:: I need to present Fay and Fax using Fa and cos(a) and sin(a). I seem to be missing a minus, why?
Relevant Equations:: None

View attachment 315305
There are two ways to think of this.
1) The vector ##F_A## is in the 3rd Quadrant. So both of its vector components will point in the negative directions, thus ##F_{Ax}## and ##F_{Ay}## will be negative.

2) Again, the vector ##F_A## is in the 3rd Quadrant. So the angle it makes with the +x axis is actually ## \theta = 180 + \alpha##. (Or, equivalently, ##\theta = 360 - \alpha ##.) In the 3rd Quadrant ##sin( \theta )## and ##cos( \theta )## are negative.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
There are two ways to think of this.
1) The vector ##F_A## is in the 3rd Quadrant. So both of its vector components will point in the negative directions, thus ##F_{Ax}## and ##F_{Ay}## will be negative.

2) Again, the vector ##F_A## is in the 3rd Quadrant. So the angle it makes with the +x axis is actually ## \theta = 180 + \alpha##. (Or, equivalently, ##\theta = 360 - \alpha ##.) In the 3rd Quadrant ##sin( \theta )## and ##cos( \theta )## are negative.

-Dan
Thank you,
I have one more question though. From my understanding, we are not thinking of Fa as a vector here (hence the arrow above it is missing), so why wouldn't Fa be negative itself? It would have both negative coordinates?
 
Edwardy said:
Thank you,
I have one more question though. From my understanding, we are not thinking of Fa as a vector here (hence the arrow above it is missing), so why wouldn't Fa be negative itself? It would have both negative coordinates?
I have left the vector notation off here (it messes up the LaTeX for some reason.) The vector ##F_A## has vector components ##F_{Ax}## and ##F_{Ay}##. These are vectors so they have magnitude and direction. The magnitudes of the vectors ##\mid F_A \mid = F_A##, ## \mid F_{Ax} \mid = F_{Ax}##, ## \mid F_{Ay} \mid = F_{Ay}## are just numbers, taken to be positive by convention. The x component of ##F_A## is ##F_{Ax} ( - \hat{i} )## where ##\hat{i}## is the unit vector in the +x direction. The negative is attached to the unit vector direction, not the magnitude.

It is simpler in 1D to just call the components of a vector positive and negative, but it's sloppy and not is not clearly covered in Physics classes. Heck, it wasn't covered clearly in my Math classes, either. But the concept is the same... vectors are never positive or negative. Their components can point in positive and negative directions. This distinction is critical when doing vectors in more than 1D.

-Dan
 
Edwardy said:
Homework Statement:: I need to present Fay and Fax using Fa and cos(a) and sin(a). I seem to be missing a minus, why?
Relevant Equations:: None
Welcome!
Could you post the whole problem as assigned?
Thank you.
 
To your original question: when you want a magnitude write it as such. Then there is absolutely no ambiguity $$ \vec r=x\hat x + y\hat y $$ where x and y are (signed) numbers. If you wish they can be represented as $$y=|r|sin\theta,~~x=|r|cos\theta $$ and $$\hat x=\hat i,~~\hat y=\hat j$$ In one dimension y=0 always and the x hat is usually omitted.
Not rocket science (oh, wait...)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top