Where does the mass of a W boson come from in beta decay?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mass of the W boson, approximately 80 GeV, arises from the principles of quantum mechanics and conservation of mass-energy during beta decay. In this process, virtual particles, such as the W boson, facilitate interactions without being directly observable, as they do not persist into the final state. The concept of "borrowing" mass-energy is crucial, as intermediate particles can temporarily utilize energy as long as it is compensated by the end of the interaction. Understanding these dynamics is essential for grasping the complexities of particle physics and quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of beta decay processes
  • Feynman diagrams and their interpretations
  • Concepts of on-shell and off-shell particles in quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of virtual particles in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of mass-energy conservation in particle interactions
  • Learn about Feynman diagrams and their applications in particle physics
  • Investigate the differences between on-shell and off-shell particles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the intricacies of particle interactions and the behavior of virtual particles in beta decay processes.

Dario
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
In beta decay an electron and neutrino are shot out of an atom. I was under the assumption that those particles decay from a w boson, but if that were the case, the atom would have to produce a lot of mass and then the mass would have to be converted into energy and carried away by the electron and neutrino. I am very confused.
During beta decay an electron and neutrino are emitted at very high speeds. I thought that the electron and neutrino were the product of w boson decay but I recently learned w bosons are over 80 GeV worth of energy. My question is, where does this mass come from? I know that atoms get enough excess energy from decay to create an electron and neutrino but how could they have enough energy to create a w boson? And this only gets worse with w+ decay
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The W boson exchanged in the process is a virtual particle. It is never actually produced.

In some ways this is similar to quantum tunneling, where a particle can cross an energy barrier even if its energy is not high enough.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke, mfb, Dario and 3 others
As mentioned, the W-particle is "virtual" in this Feynman diagram. It also shows how deceiving these Feynman diagrams can be. If you see such a decay, as here,

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/W-boson

you only see the leading term in an infinite series, not a physical process which can be directly measured. Of course, the in- and outstates are fixed, but in between there are infinitely many contributions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Orodruin
To be slightly more explicit, in quantum mechanics, as a general rule, conservation of mass-energy must only be satisfied by the end state relative to the beginning state. What we consider to be a necessary intermediate part of the process (even though it isn't directly observable) can "borrow" mass-energy, so long as it is "repaid" by the time that the process ends without being impossible. In a particle physics context, we call intermediate particles that don't persist into the end state that require such a borrowing "virtual particles."

Closely related are the concepts of "on shell" and "off shell":

In physics, particularly in quantum field theory, configurations of a physical system that satisfy classical equations of motion are called "on the mass shell" or simply more often on shell; while those that do not are called "off the mass shell", or off shell. In quantum field theory, virtual particles are termed off shell because they do not satisfy the energy–momentum relation; real exchange particles do satisfy this relation and are termed on shell (mass shell).

The mass of virtual particles is not irrelevant, however. The probability of a possible quantum interaction happening is impacted by the masses of the virtual particles involved in the interaction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K