Where Does the Term "Kinetic Potential" Come From?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Niels Bore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Term
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
Niels Bore
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
I made it to grad school in physics, and then my mind sort of melted and I chose another career. Lately I have been brushing up on math and physics for no clear reason. I decided to join this board so I would have a place to bring my strange questions.

Today I was reading up on Lagrangian mechanics, and I saw the term "kinetic potential" used to describe the difference between the kinetic and potential energies of a system. This is often expressed as L = T - V, where T is kinetic energy and V is potential energy.

Here is what's bugging me: why do they call it "kinetic potential"? Unless I've slipped more than I realize, all the potential for additional kinetic energy is found in the potential energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zacarias Nason
Physics news on Phys.org
Niels Bore said:
I made it to grad school in physics, and then my mind sort of melted and I chose another career. Lately I have been brushing up on math and physics for no clear reason. I decided to join this board so I would have a place to bring my strange questions.

Today I was reading up on Lagrangian mechanics, and I saw the term "kinetic potential" used to describe the difference between the kinetic and potential energies of a system. This is often expressed as L = T - V, where T is kinetic energy and V is potential energy.

Here is what's bugging me: why do they call it "kinetic potential"? Unless I've slipped more than I realize, all the potential for additional kinetic energy is found in the potential energy.
Is it not mean to be Kinetic-Potential energy, where "-" is to be read as minus?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vioh
That would make more sense.

I found the term "kinetic potential" on p. 229 of Morse and Feshbach, Volume I. Maybe it's a corruption of "kinetic - potential"?
 
They use the term "kinetic potential" for what usually is called Lagrangeean or "Lagrange function".
Just a label. An unusual one, maybe.

"We can then express the kinetic potential L = T- V, the difference between
kinetic and potential energies (sometimes called the Lagrange function),
in terms of the q's and their time derivatives..".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Niels Bore
One of the annoying things about technical education is that we are expected to use terms that haven't been explained. Sometimes the explanations can be very helpful in understanding the thought process behind the material. I thought maybe there was a helpful explanation here.

The passage the previous poster helpfully provided is the one I referred to.
 
One aspect of "potential" is that
its "derivative" gives something that is
(in some sense) "more physical" than the potential itself
because the potential may admit transformations that still lead to the same derivative.
That is to say, the potential is not uniquely determined.

Given the equations of motion, there isn't a unique Lagrangian that leads to those equations
[unless you make additional specifications].
 
I guess if no one here knows the answer, I shouldn't feel too bad.
 
He referred to Morse and Feshbach, "Methods of Mathematical Physics," and nasu gave a quote from it.

I don't remember ever seeing the Lagrangian called "kinetic potential" either, but I've never taught a course in classical mechanics at that level, and it's been a long time since I last studied Lagrangian mechanics, in grad school from Goldstein's book.

That book was published in 1953, so it could simply be old-fashioned terminology that was already falling out of use at the time, but the authors learned it that way and used it out of habit.