Where Is the Error in This Power Transmission Calculation?

Click For Summary
The calculation of power loss in transmission cables shows an unrealistic figure of 139 MW, indicating an error in the resistance value used. A suggested correction points to a potential typo in the ohmic resistance, likely being 20 ohms. Typical copper cables have a resistance of around 8 ohms per kilometer, which implies an implausible distance of 2500 km from the power station to the city. This discrepancy highlights the need for accurate resistance values in power transmission calculations. Correcting these values is essential for realistic power loss assessments.
songoku
Messages
2,499
Reaction score
401
Homework Statement
A power station needs to deliver 20 MW of power to a city. This power is generated at 16 kV and then stepped up to 240 kV. The total resistance of the transmission cables is 20 kΩ. Show the power loss during transmission is 139 kW
Relevant Equations
P = V.I

##P=I^2 R##
The current in transmission cables = 20 MW / 240 kV = 250 / 3 A

Power loss in cables =(250/3)2 x 20 x 103 = 139 MW , which is not possible

Where is my mistake?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there must be a typo in the ohmic resistance of the transmission cable, most likely it is ##20\Omega##. A typical copper cable has a resistance of around ##8\Omega## per km, so if we take it that the total resistance is ##20000\Omega## this means that the power station is located 2500km away from the city...Which of course doesn't look right.
 
Thank you very much Delta2
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
907
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K