Where is the Single Spring Located in the Indy Car's Rear Suspension?

  • Context: Automotive 
  • Thread starter Thread starter average guy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Spring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the placement and design of a single spring in the rear suspension of a 1963-era Indy car, focusing on the challenges of integrating this component within a double wishbone suspension system. Participants explore various design considerations, historical context, and practical implications of their proposed setups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the optimal location for the spring between the upright and the main space frame, referencing the difficulty in visualizing the rear suspension layout.
  • Another participant suggests that the coilover should be mounted on the inner upper suspension pivot and the lower pivot on the upright, discussing the implications of motion ratios based on the spring's placement.
  • A participant expresses a desire to adopt a mono-shock design, questioning the feasibility and safety of such a setup compared to traditional designs.
  • Concerns are raised about the suitability of modern pushrod and bell crank designs for street use, with one participant arguing that these setups can be too twitchy and unforgiving.
  • Another participant counters that pushrods and bell cranks can work for street applications, though they note the higher costs and packaging challenges associated with these designs.
  • One participant describes their mechanical engineering approach, indicating that the spring will be positioned at a 45-degree angle and expressing concerns about uneven loading on the upright.
  • A suggestion is made to reference a specific car design as a potential model for the spring setup.
  • Participants discuss the goal of building a car that is accessible for home builders, emphasizing the use of mild steel and simple construction techniques.
  • There is mention of the Apexspeed forum as a resource for further information and community support regarding open wheel car design.
  • One participant reflects on the challenges of using pushrod suspensions, noting their wear characteristics and the engineering considerations involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the design and practicality of the suspension systems discussed. There is no clear consensus on the best approach, with multiple competing perspectives on the use of mono-shock designs versus traditional setups, as well as the viability of pushrod mechanisms for street applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the historical evolution of Indy car suspensions and the implications of design choices on performance and safety. The discussion includes references to specific engineering challenges and the need for careful consideration of load distribution and material strength.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to automotive engineers, hobbyists building race cars, and those studying the evolution of suspension design in motorsports.

average guy
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
where do i locate the spring between the upright and
the main space frame?
this is '63 era technology build. first rear engine American mades
like Mickey Thompson cars.
can't quite get a good look at rear suspension in most of pic's.
in the front i can go right down the middle but
in rear the drive axles are in the way.

Have A Nice Day!
 

Attachments

  • MT Indy Car.jpg
    MT Indy Car.jpg
    13.5 KB · Views: 514
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you look closely you'll see the coilover mounted on the inner upper suspension pivot and the lower pivot on the upright. The farther out on the bottom of the upright, the more direct motion ratio you get. However, the more angle away from perpendicular the less motion ratio you get.

Front should be very similar but inside the arms.
 
bender
i'll have to back pedal here.
i would like to take advantage of progress.
http://www.aaim1.com/pdfs/anatomy.pdf
it will be double wishbone like this current car.
a arms will be mounted to frame square not like this diagram.
how do i apply single spring to this?

Have A Nice Day!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You want to do a mono-shock design? Do you mean a sliding shuttle design as was used on some cars in the 90s? In general, unless you are racing a FV you probably don't want to do a mono spring setup.
Perhaps some more information is needed here.
 
the evelution of Indy suspensions stems from the requirement to narrow up the " car body" and lighten the weight as much as possible to the point where we spring / shock is now mounted inboard and runs through the bell crank via push rod. The major draw back to this design FOR THE STREET is the fact that this suspension is VERY twitchy.

These setups run very high spring rates, have very limited travel and are damn near like a go cart set up as they are sprung so tight. These set ups pound the heck out of the suspension parts and are very hard on t he rod ends.
I would even say this design is flat out dangerous for the street. You have no room for error and the set up it totally no forgiving. When you have the earlier double wishbone set up with the shocks mounted inboard to the top wish bone and the bottom to the frame,it is a lot more forgiving. And a lot softer on the ride. I can not over stress the input form my drivers ( 30 plus years of seat time and many road course championships) the push rod set up is flat out no forgiving regarding drive input. No room for mistakes.
 
Last edited:
I see no reason why pushrods and bell cranks can't work just fine for the street. A number of road cars use the setup. It's not common because it's expensive and the aero benefits are rather limited in a car with fenders. It also doesn't always package that well.
 
slideways
the mechanical engineering part is done.
the spring goes from bottom of upright to
top of frame at roughly 45 degree angle.
i was just concerned with loading upright unevenly.
i guess if it's rigid enough that's a non-issue.
i think building it to carry load of double a arms and
axle carriers will as a side benefit make it strong
enough for spring mount.
in plain language I'm not going to beef it up anymore than that
for spring.

Have A Nice Day!
 
One way to do it:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3360047/1976-mclaren-f1/page-4

If the suspension/upright can't handle the asymmetrical loading it's not strong enough to handle the braking load.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ranger mike & mender
mike didn't see your last post until now.
no street here. no bellcrank inboard springs.
mender
we're good for now.

Have A Nice Day!
 
  • #10
It appears the question was answered but as a general tip, the guys on the Apexspeed forum can be very good when it comes to these sort of questions. Apexspeed is a forum specifically talking about open wheel, amateur formula cars. There are several members there who have built their own cars. Additionally some of the manufactures such as Stohr and several of the F1000 designers post and answer questions.

(No, I don't have any financial ties to Apexspeed and I didn't join the forum to spam it. With that out of the way, I am Higerian Roialty. Send me banke numbrs I send you sister princes OK?)

Here are a few threads with a few good pictures
http://www.apexspeed.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22161
http://seanmaisey.blogspot.com/sear...-max=2012-01-01T00:00:00-05:00&max-results=50 - lots of pictures as he restores a car.
http://www.apexspeed.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25227 - a fair number of pictures but many were removed a few years after the fact (?)
 
  • #11
slideways
the whole idea is to build something that
most people can build in their garage.
this car uses mild steel and is arc welded together.
1" square .063 wall tubing.
in place of bends the tubing is cut at 45 degree angles.
a Popular Mechanics type project.
more building per dollar.

Have A Nice Day!
 
  • #12
average guy said:
slideways
the whole idea is to build something that
most people can build in their garage.
this car uses mild steel and is arc welded together.
1" square .063 wall tubing.
in place of bends the tubing is cut at 45 degree angles.
a Popular Mechanics type project.
more building per dollar.

Have A Nice Day!

You might ask some of the guys over there. Many did build their cars in garages at home. Not all but many. Many would have good ideas how to make an easier to weld frame.
 
  • #13
slideways
Popular Mechanics doesn't have a forum.
it may look like forum but i believe the answers
are provided by them.
enough about that.
i think the forum members here are much brighter
than magazine writers.:smile:

Have A Nice Day!
 
  • #14
Popular Mechanics?

Oh, sorry I see, no I was talking about asking the Apexspeed guys, not PM. I can see how that wasn't clear in the post but that is what I meant.
 
  • #15
slideways said:
(No, I don't have any financial ties to Apexspeed and I didn't join the forum to spam it. With that out of the way, I am Higerian Roialty. Send me banke numbrs I send you sister princes OK?)
Send money first, then princes.:approve:
 
  • #16
i have been on APEXspeed for 10 years...good info source
as long as you know pitfalls of pushrod suspensions ..go for it..it is a bear on wear though..
 
  • #17
ranger mike
i guess you could call it 'pushrod' suspension.
it's a little distracting with 'pushrods' for engines.
yeah i know no pushrods in those engines.
it's really a bellcrank mechanism.
it's also grossly overloading the small bellcrank
from a classic engineering viewpoint.
the metallurgy let's them get by with it.
anyhow that's for somebody else, not me.
i'm just playing Jim Hall here.:smile:

Have A Nice Day!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2K ·
60
Replies
2K
Views
861K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
33K