Which Abstract Algebra Textbook is Best for Self-Study?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting a textbook for self-study in abstract algebra, specifically comparing Artin's Algebra and Dummit's Abstract Algebra. Participants share their experiences and preferences regarding the clarity, approach, and content of each book.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a preference for Artin's Algebra, suggesting it is superior to Dummit and Foote's text.
  • Another participant questions the basis for the claim of superiority, seeking specific comparisons.
  • A participant highlights Mike Artin's reputation as a world-class algebraist and notes the clarity and power of his arguments.
  • Concerns are raised about Dummit and Foote's approach to proofs, which some find unhelpful for understanding, while acknowledging their clear exposition and problem selection.
  • It is noted that Dummit and Foote covers topics not included in Artin's book, such as tensor algebra.
  • Participants suggest consulting both texts to determine which aligns better with individual learning preferences.
  • Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

    Participants express differing opinions on the merits of Artin's and Dummit's texts, indicating a lack of consensus on which is definitively better for self-study.

    Contextual Notes

    Participants' preferences may depend on their individual learning styles and the specific content they wish to study, which remains unresolved.

kostas230
Messages
96
Reaction score
3
I need to buy a textbook for self study in abstract algebra for self study. Although I'm a physics major, I have lot's of experience with proof. I'm between Artin's Algebra and Dummit's Abstract Algebra. Which one do you recommend?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Artin is in many ways superior to Dummit and Foote.
 
micromass said:
Artin is in many ways superior to Dummit and Foote.

In what ways exactly?
 
Well Mike Artin is a very famous world class algebraist/algebraic geometer.

His insights and arguments are very clear and powerful.

Dummitt and Foote also has some very clear expositions an excellent selection of problems, but i myself disagree with their philosophy of explanation.

it doesn't hurt to consult both books.

What bothered me about Dummitt and Foote waS A TENDENCY TO GIVE PROOFS THAT WERE unhelpful for understanding or calculation, and put the more helpful approaches in the problem sets.

No doubt Dummitt and Foote are strong algebraists, but Mike Artin is, in my opinion, on a very special and elite level. His book gives you the course for MIT sophomores.

Dummitt and Foote does cover some topics omitted from Artin, like tensor algebra.

Why don't you read a bit of both of them and see which suits you better? if you find you prfer Dummitt and Foote, then use that to learn, and I suggest graduaTING TO Artin later.

What do you say micromass?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K