Which Linear Algebra Book is Best for Self-Study: A Comparison of Lang and Axler

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the selection of linear algebra textbooks for self-study, particularly comparing Sheldon Axler's and Serge Lang's works. Participants share their experiences and preferences, focusing on how these books align with applications in physics, especially quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in self-studying linear algebra and asks for recommendations, noting the limited availability of Axler's book.
  • Another participant suggests that the choice of book may depend on the individual's current knowledge of linear algebra, recommending Lang's "Introduction to Linear Algebra" for beginners.
  • A participant with graduate-level physics experience indicates familiarity with matrix operations and expresses a desire to understand vector spaces for quantum mechanics.
  • Some participants recommend Treil's book as particularly suitable for physics students, while others argue that Lang's "Linear Algebra" is also a good option.
  • There is a suggestion that Axler's "Linear Algebra Done Right" is beneficial for physics students, despite some criticism regarding its avoidance of determinants.
  • One participant mentions the challenge of borrowing Axler's book for only four days, which complicates their study plans.
  • A request is made for a list of typical topics covered in linear algebra courses within physics departments, highlighting concerns about time constraints due to lab work.
  • Another participant provides a detailed list of important topics in linear algebra relevant to physics, including vector spaces, linear transformations, and spectral theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the best textbook for self-study, with no clear consensus on which book is superior. Some favor Axler's approach, while others prefer Lang's or Treil's books, indicating a variety of perspectives on the suitability of each text for different backgrounds and needs.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of prior knowledge in determining the most appropriate textbook. There are also mentions of specific topics that may not be covered comprehensively in all recommended texts, suggesting a need for supplemental resources.

blue_leaf77
Science Advisor
Messages
2,637
Reaction score
786
I decide to self-study linear algebra. I have heard words about some good books on this subject such as Sheldon Axler's. Unfortunately his book is only loanable for 4 days in my university library. There is this book from S. Lang that I can borrow for one month, so what do you think about this book? If you have your own recommendation please feel free to mention this out. Books which are more aligned to its use in physics such as QM are very welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please tell us a bit more about your current knowledge of LA. For example, what do you know about matrices, systems of linear equations, dot products, coordinate geometry?

In any case, my favorite book is a free one: http://www.math.brown.edu/~treil/papers/LADW/LADW.html But it is nothing for somebody who truly knows nothing about LA.

Lang is very good, but depending on your knowledge, you might be better off with the more easy-going "Introduction of linear algebra" by Lang, as opposed to his "Linear Algebra".
 
I'm currently in a graduate level of physics, so I have already had those basics of matrix operations (multiplication, inverse), eigenvalues problem, etc. Now I'm more into understanding of vector spaces, because it will greatly help me with my graduate QM.
 
OK, then I think Treil's algebra done wrong book would really be a perfect match for you. It really does contain everything of linear algebra that you need for QM and relativity. But Lang's Linear Algebra book should suit you well too, if you prefer that, although Treil is better :)
 
Just checked in the library website, seems like Lang's introduction to linear algebra is also available for short loan period. I guess I will go for his Linear Algebra and resort to Treil's free book when I get stuck in a certain topic. If only Treil's book is available in print version I will go for it instead, you are right his book seems to be more suited to physics student, but I don't like that I always have to turn my computer on first in order to start reading.
 
You could always print the book :D But yeah, I see your point.

Anyway, Lang's "introduction to linear algebra" will not be useful for you, go for his "Linear Algebra" instead.
 
Ok anyway thanks for all your recommendations.
 
Axler's book "Linear algebra done right" is also very good for physics students. micromass doesn't like it, I think mainly because it avoids determinants, but I think the selection of topics is very nice for quantum mechanics. You could supplement your Axler by reading the excellent chapter on determinants in Treil. (I'm sure you can study one easy chapter on a screen).

I'm not familiar with Lang's book. I think almost any linear algebra book will do, but I would avoid books like Anton, which focus too much on real vector spaces and delay the introduction of linear operators far too long.
 
Fredrik said:
Axler's book "Linear algebra done right" is also very good for physics students. micromass doesn't like it, I think mainly because it avoids talking about determinants

Yes, I recommend to avoid it for a first exposure to the topic. But since the OP already knows about determinants, maybe Axler would be a very good choice for him!
 
  • #10
My situation is that, as I mentioned in my first post, I can borrow Axler's book for only four days. That's unfortunate indeed.
 
  • #11
Just one last request, could somebody give a list of typical topics covered in linear algebra course taught in physics department, at least in your own department? I have searched for syllabuses in some physics department webpages but apparently many of them do not offer a standalone linear algebra course. I think it is packaged in another course. The thing is I already started experimenting in the lab so I won't have enough time to go through all the chapters in the book.
 
  • #12
I'll list the topics that I think are the most important.

Prerequisites:

Complex numbers
Polynomials (Use Axler for this)

The basics:

Vector spaces over ##\mathbb C##
Subspaces
Linear independence
Span
Bases

Inner products and norms:

Orthogonality
The norm associated with an inner product
Orthonormal bases

Linear transformations:

Components of a linear transformation with respect to a pair of ordered bases. (I wrote a https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/matrix-representations-of-linear-transformations.694922/ about this).
Matrix multiplication (Prove that ##[T\circ S]_{E,G}=[T]_{E,F}[ S]_{F,G}##).
Change of basis (Prove that ##[T]_F## is similar to ##[T]_E##).
Kernel and range (the definitions and the rank-nullity theorem)
The adjoint of a linear transformation
Self-adjoint and unitary linear operatorsBijective linear transformations:

Determinants (Use Treil for this)
The theorem that lists conditions equivalent to ##\det T\neq 0##.

Spectral theory:

Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
The spectral theorem for self-adjoint linear operators (Surprisingly easy. See this post).

Two more things:

Positive-semidefinite linear operators (Use Treil for this)
Projection operators (Prove the finite-dimensional versions of the theorems in section 6.3 of Friedman's "Foundations of modern analysis").
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77
  • #13
Thanks a lot Fredrik.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K