Which ball travels further, up a ramp or thrown in the air

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexstrasza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Ball Ramp
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem comparing the distances traveled by two identical balls: one thrown up a frictionless ramp and the other thrown into the air at the same angle and initial velocity. Participants explore concepts related to energy conservation, forces acting on the balls, and the definitions of distance and height in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to analyze the equations of motion for both scenarios, questioning the applicability of certain equations and the role of forces like the normal force. There is discussion about the meaning of "travel further" and whether it refers to horizontal distance or height. Some participants suggest using energy conservation principles to compare the two cases.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the mechanics involved and the implications of energy conservation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the normal force and its role in energy transfer, but there is no explicit consensus on the outcomes or interpretations yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the nature of the forces acting on the balls, particularly in relation to the frictionless surface and the definitions of mechanical energy. There is also a focus on clarifying the differences in how distance is measured in each scenario.

Alexstrasza
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two identical balls, one is thrown at angle α up a frictionless surface, the other one is thrown at the same angle up in the air.

Both have the same initial velocity.

A. Which one travels further? Explain.
B. Is the mechanical energy of the first ball conserved? Explain.

Homework Equations



F=ma
K(e)=mv^2/2, P(e)=m*g*h
Momentum... p=m*v
W=Fa

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
A. I am having trouble with this one.

I tried to use v(f)=v(i)+2ax but then it is the same equation for both the balls. That can't be right?

I think that the ball in the air would travel the shorter distance, because it doesn't have the support of the ramp.

B. The energy of the first ball is conserved, because there is no friction and the only force except gravity working on that ball is N, which doesn't do work because it's perpendicular.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexstrasza said:
I tried to use v(f)=v(i)+2ax but then it is the same equation for both the balls. That can't be right?
What are the accelerations for the two balls? Are they the same?
What is x, and how does that equation work if you have to consider two dimensions?
Alexstrasza said:
I think that the ball in the air would travel the shorter distance, because it doesn't have the support of the ramp.
There is also a different effect in the opposite direction.
Alexstrasza said:
B. The energy of the first ball is conserved, because there is no friction and the only force except gravity working on that ball is N, which doesn't do work because it's perpendicular.
Is it really perpendicular?
What exactly counts as mechanical energy?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alexstrasza
I'm not sure what is meant by "travel further". Horizontal distance? Height?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alexstrasza
The "Range" equation will quickly give you the distance the ball in air will travel.
Now if the initial kinetic energy is converted to potential energy,
how far can the ball travel on the incline?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alexstrasza
Thanks for the replies everyone. Sorry for late update.

The question was asking to find which ball will reach the maximum height. I tried to solve using energy conservation but then it gives me the same solution for both.

mfb said:
Is it really perpendicular?
What exactly counts as mechanical energy?

Isn't N always perpendicular to the surface? Energy = initial velocity squared x mass / 2 and energy is conserved.

J Hann said:
The "Range" equation will quickly give you the distance the ball in air will travel.
Now if the initial kinetic energy is converted to potential energy,
how far can the ball travel on the incline?

That is what I am confused about, what is the difference between how far the ball travels up an incline vs. at an angle in the air. I am pretty sure that the incline "helps" the ball but not sure how to express it.
 
Alexstrasza said:
The question was asking to find which ball will reach the maximum height.
Ah, now the question makes sense.

Alexstrasza said:
I tried to solve using energy conservation but then it gives me the same solution for both.
Describe what you did for each. They are not quite the same.

Hint: What's the speed of each ball when it reaches maximum height?
 
As Doc Al implied, consider the "total" energy at the top of the trajectory for each case.
 
Alexstrasza said:
I tried to solve using energy conservation but then it gives me the same solution for both.
Energy is not the only conserved quantity that is relevant for the freely falling ball.
Alexstrasza said:
Isn't N always perpendicular to the surface?
The force from the surface is, the force from gravity is not.
 
J Hann said:
The "Range" equation will quickly give you the distance the ball in air will travel.
Now if the initial kinetic energy is converted to potential energy,
how far can the ball travel on the incline?
No. It will not give distance traveled.

It will only give the displacement.
 
  • #10
Alexstrasza said:
B. The energy of the first ball is conserved, because there is no friction and the only force except gravity working on that ball is N, which doesn't do work because it's perpendicular.
Quite so, the normal force does no work. But forces acting on an object can transfer the energy of an object from one form to another without doing any net work. E.g. when a ball rolls down a slope, the friction transfers energy into rotational KE.
This is the way that the ramp 'helps' the ball go higher.
 
  • #11
Frictionless surface.
 
  • #12
SammyS said:
Frictionless surface.
Yes, I understand that. I was just using rolling down a frictional slope as an example of how a force that does no work can transfer energy from one mode to another. The same happens here, but not in respect of rotation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K