Which Dickey-Fuller test should I apply to this time series?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Dickey-Fuller test for assessing the stationarity of a time series derived from climate data. Participants explore the implications of including intercepts and time trends in the model and how these affect the choice of Dickey-Fuller test to apply.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their expectation of the underlying model for the time series, which includes an intercept, a positive linear time trend, and normally distributed errors, leading to a specific form of the Dickey-Fuller test.
  • The same participant questions whether the first difference of the time series retains the time trend, suggesting that it may only have an intercept based on their calculations.
  • Another participant agrees that the difference operation on a linear trend produces a constant, not a linear trend, and references a source discussing the implications of using different forms in the Dickey-Fuller test.
  • A third participant states their understanding of the null hypothesis related to the existence of a unit root and expresses confusion regarding the use of trend terms in the context of quadratic terms.
  • A fourth participant provides a mathematical explanation of how the difference of a quadratic term results in a linear term, contributing to the discussion about the implications for the Dickey-Fuller test.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the first difference of the time series should include a time trend, leading to an unresolved discussion about the appropriate Dickey-Fuller test to apply.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the implications of including trend terms depend on the specific forms of the models being tested, and there is uncertainty about how these choices affect the null hypothesis and test statistics.

pythonscript
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a time series of climate data that I'm testing for stationarity. Based on previous research, I expect the model underlying the data to have an intercept term, a positive linear time trend, and some normally distributed error term. In other words, I expect the underlying model to look something like this:

yt = a0 + a1t + β yt-1 + ut $

where ut is normally distributed. Since I'm assuming the underlying model has both an intercept and a linear time trend, I tested for a unit root with equation #3 of the simple Dickey-Fuller test, as shown:

∇yt = α01t+δ yt-1+ut

This test returns a critical value that would lead me to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the underlying model is non-stationary. However, I question if I'm applying this correctly, since even though the underlying model is assumed to have an intercept and a time trend, this does not imply that the first difference ∇yt will as well. Quite the opposite, in fact, if my math is correct.

Calculating the first difference based on the equation of the assumed underlying model gives:
∇yt = yt - yt-1 = [a0 + a1 + β yt-1 + ut] - [a0 + a1(t-1) + β yt-2 + ut-1]

∇yt = [a0 - a0] + [a1t - a1(t-1)] + β[yt-1 - yt-2] + [ut - ut-1]

∇yt = a1 + β * ∇yt-1 + ut - ut-1$

Therefore, the first difference ∇yt appears to only have an intercept, not a time trend.

Because the underlying model has an intercept and a time trend, should I use the Dickey-Fuller test that includes an intercept and time trend when it tests for a unit root, or should I use the Dickey-Fuller test that only includes an intercept because the first difference of the original time series only has an intercept?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct that the difference operation a linear trend term (k)(t) produces a constant, not another linear trend term.

It's interesting to try to read that Wikipedia article you linked. It's about some hypothesis tests, but it never manages to state the null hypotheses and the test statistics. Apparently you understand the test statistics - which is more than I know.

However, I did find this page: http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/18133/selecting-regression-type-for-dickey-fuller-test where the reply mentions that using the test with term of the form (k)(t) implies we are investigating a model with a quadratic trend. So my guess is that you don't use that form to test your null hypothesis.
 
As far as I know, the null hypothesis is that a unit root exists and that the process is therefore stationary. I had found that thread you linked, and I'm the user who started the short but ongoing discussion in the comments. The linked post (listed in the right-hand column) is also mine, and is quite similar to my post here.

http://stats.stackexchange.com/q/44647

I don't understand why using a test with a trend term a1t would be used with a quadratic term, however. Can you shed any light on that?
 
The only light I can shed is that if f(t) = kt^2 then
\triangle f(t) = f(t+1) - f(t) = k(t+1)^2 - kt^2 = k( t^2 + 2t + 1) - kt^2 = 2kt + k
So the \triangle of a model with a t^2 term has a term linear in t.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K