How Do We Find the Parametrization σ?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parametrization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the integral of the curl of the vector field \( f(x,y,z) = (1,1,1) \times g(x,y,z) \) over the surface \( \Sigma \) defined by \( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 \) and \( x + y + z \geq 1 \) equals zero. The application of Stokes' theorem is central, as it relates the surface integral of the curl to a line integral over the boundary \( \sigma \). The boundary is determined by the intersection of the sphere and the plane, leading to the conclusion that the vector \( (1,1,1) \) is perpendicular to the plane defined by \( x + y + z = 1 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically Stokes' theorem.
  • Familiarity with curl and surface integrals.
  • Knowledge of parametric equations and geometric intersections.
  • Basic proficiency in manipulating multivariable functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Stokes' theorem in detail, focusing on its applications in vector fields.
  • Learn about the properties of curl and how it relates to vector fields.
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of intersections between surfaces and planes.
  • Investigate specific forms of the function \( g(x,y,z) \) to understand its impact on the integral.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone involved in advanced calculus or vector field analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in applying Stokes' theorem in practical scenarios.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that $\iint_{\Sigma}(\nabla\times f)\cdot d\Sigma=0$ for the function $f(x,y,z)=(1,1,1)\times g(x,y,z)$ when $\Sigma$ is the surfcae that is defined by the relations $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ and $x+y+z\geq 1$.
I have done the following:

Let $g(x,y,z)=(g_1, g_2, g_3)$. Then $f(x,y,z)=(1,1,1)\times (g_1, g_2, g_3)=(g_3-g_2, g_1-g_3, g_2-g_1)$.

From Stokes theorem we have that $$ \iint_{\Sigma}(\nabla\times f)\cdot d\Sigma=\oint_{\sigma}f\cdot d\sigma$$

So, we have to find the boundary of the surface, $\sigma$. For that do we have to set equal the relations $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ and $x+y+z= 1$. I yes, we get the following:

$$x^2+y^2+z^2=x+y+z\\ \Rightarrow x^2-x+y^2-y+z^2-z=0 \\ \Rightarrow x^2-x+\frac{1}{4}+y^2-y+\frac{1}{4}+z^2-z+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{3}{4} \\ \Rightarrow \left (x-\frac{1}{2}\right )^2+\left (y-\frac{1}{2}\right )^2+\left (z-\frac{1}{2}\right )^2=\frac{3}{4} \\ \Rightarrow \frac{4}{3}\left (x-\frac{1}{2}\right )^2+\frac{4}{3}\left (y-\frac{1}{2}\right )^2+\frac{4}{3}\left (z-\frac{1}{2}\right )^2=1 \\ \Rightarrow \left (\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}x-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\right )^2+\left (\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}y-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\right )^2+\left (\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}z-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\right )^2=1 $$

How can we continue? How can we get $\sigma$ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

I want to show that $\iint_{\Sigma}(\nabla\times f)\cdot d\Sigma=0$ for the function $f(x,y,z)=(1,1,1)\times g(x,y,z)$ when $\Sigma$ is the surfcae that is defined by the relations $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ and $x+y+z\geq 1$.

Doesn't that depend on exactly what the function, g, is?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Doesn't that depend on exactly what the function, g, is?

We don't have any information about g. So, we cannot show that without an expression for g? (Wondering)
 
well, I expect that the key point here is that the vector (1, 1, 1) is perpendicular to the plane x+ y+ z= 1. And notice that, of course, the spherical surface and the plane have the same boundary. By Stokes theorem, as you say, $$\int\int_\Sigma (\nabla \times f)d\Sigma= \oint f\cdot d\sigma$$. Applying exactly the same theorem to the plane, and writing [math]\Pi[/math] for the region of the plane bounded by the circle of intersection, we have $$\int\int_\Pi (\nabla \times f)d\Pi= \oint f\cdot (\nabla\times f) d\sigma$$.

Together, $$\int\int_\Sigma (\nabla \times f)d\Sigma= \int\int_\Pi (\nabla\times f)d\Pi$$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K