Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the classification of "rules of thumb" in the context of architecture and expert systems, specifically whether they are considered heuristic knowledge or factual knowledge. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these terms.
Discussion Character
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses confusion about whether "rule of thumb" refers to heuristic knowledge or factual knowledge, suggesting that heuristic knowledge should be the correct classification.
- Another participant argues that there is no clear barrier between the categories of heuristic and factual knowledge, implying that both are inherently vague.
- A third participant comments on the vagueness of the terms, proposing that a "rule of thumb" is something that is not universally true but is often reliable enough for guidance.
- This participant reiterates the idea that "heuristic" is the appropriate classification for rules of thumb.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the classification of rules of thumb, indicating multiple competing views on the definitions and applicability of heuristic versus factual knowledge.
Contextual Notes
The discussion highlights the ambiguity in the definitions of heuristic and factual knowledge, as well as the subjective interpretation of what constitutes a "rule of thumb."