Which Linear Algebra Course Should I Choose for Graduate Work in Physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision between taking Linear Algebra II or Intermediate Linear Algebra for a student planning to pursue graduate work in theoretical physics or mathematics. The student has already completed Linear Algebra I and is considering which course would be more beneficial for their future studies. Linear Algebra II focuses on applications relevant to physics, including differential equations, eigenvalue problems, and projections, while Intermediate Linear Algebra emphasizes a rigorous theoretical foundation. The student's physics professor indicated that either course would be acceptable, but opinions from peers suggest that Linear Algebra II may be more aligned with the practical applications encountered in physics. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards Linear Algebra II as the more useful option for a physics major, particularly due to its relevance to topics commonly found in physics courses.
Porthos
Messages
20
Reaction score
3
I am planning my courses for next semester, and I am unsure of which direction to go in with linear algebra. I have already taken the following course:

Linear Algebra I
Properties and applications of vectors; matrix algebra; solving systems of linear equations; determinants; vector spaces; orthogonality; eigenvalues and eigenvectors.


The course went well, and I am looking forward to a second course, but my hope is to eventually do graduate work in physics or math, probably on the more theoretical side of physics, but I am only in my first year, so I am not entirely sure at this stage. I have the option of taking either one of the following courses:

Linear Algebra II
Vector space examples. Inner products, orthogonal sets including Legendre polynomials, trigonometric functions, wavelets. Projections, least squares, normal equations, Fourier approximations. Eigenvalue problems, diagonalization, defective matrices. Coupled difference and differential equations; applications such as predator-prey, business competition, coupled oscillators. Singular value decomposition, image approximations. Linear transformations, graphics.


OR

Intermediate Linear Algebra
A rigorous development of lines and planes in Rn; linear transformations and abstract vector spaces. Determinants and an introduction to diagonalization and its applications including the characteristic polynomials, eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

The former is offered through the Applied Mathematics Department and the latter is through the Mathematics Department. Neither one is an anti-requisite for the other. The only significant difference, besides the department offering the course, is the fact that the former requires a second course in calculus. My plan is to only take one of the courses, and I am taking the second course in calculus in the coming semester, so I cannot take the former in the coming semester. If, however, it is the better course for what I am looking for, I am fine with waiting.

Basically, I am wondering which one people think will be more useful for physics? I recognize that you have not (necessarily) taken either course, but I would imagine that those with a greater knowledge of advanced physics than I have would have a better idea than I do of which one seems to be of more direct use. I assume it is the former, seeing as it is more based on the applications of linear algebra, but I wonder if it would be of more use to go more deeply into the theoretical aspects of linear algebra in order to be better prepared for potential graduate work?

I have spoken to my physics professor this semester, and I got the impression that he doesn't feel that it matters which one I take (neither is actually a requirement for physics), but I was curious as to what others with experience think about this.

This thread (https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...near-algebra-ii-or-numerical-analysis.563174/) specifically discusses Linear Algebra II at Western University (where I am located), but it is comparing a different course.

I appreciate any advice you can provide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess would be linear algebra 2 looks more like something a physics major would take. It has differential equations, oscillators...
 
Definitely Linear Algebra II - I've encountered nearly every topic in that description in physics.
 
Thanks, jedishrfu and Mmm_Pasta. That is what I figured, but I thought that it wouldn't hurt to ask. I appreciate you both taking the time to respond.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top