Which Math Methods Book is Better?

Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I only know Hassani's book, and it's great!
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
  • #3
Both are good, but Hassani is more comprehensive (and more modern).
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
  • #4
In my opinion Hassani.
Ssnow
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
  • #5
Absolutely Hassani. I have an older version.
 
  • #6
Alone this quotation from the preface in Hassani's book tells it all: "If math is the language of nature, physics is its poetry." (quoted from my memory, I don't have the book here, at the moment).
 
  • Like
Likes Jianphys17
  • #7
vanhees71 said:
I don't have the book here, at the moment
Here you go
It is said that mathematics is the language of Nature. If so, then physics is its poetry.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #8
I never seen the folks agree so much on a book as we have done here in this thread :)
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #9
It's true !
:wideeyed:
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #10
Just to break the agreement: Hassani sucks, Arfken Weber is much better. (Just kidding! :biggrin: )
 
  • Like
Likes smodak
  • #11
Ah i thought !
 
  • #12
Demystifier said:
Just to break the agreement: Hassani sucks, Arfken Weber is much better. (Just kidding! :biggrin: )
Hm, it must be at least as hot weather outside at your place as here in Frankfurt :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #13
vanhees71 said:
Hm, it must be at least as hot weather outside at your place as here in Frankfurt :rolleyes:
Until a few hours ago it was very hot in Zagreb, but now it is raining and quite humid. :oldgrumpy:

By the way, my brother lives in Frankfurt, so if you see him say hallo to him! :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes smodak and vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top