Which operator corresponds to the Green function in QFT?

In summary, the Feynman propagator is the Green's function of the operator (except maybe for a constant) in QFT. However, in the case of a non-free interacting field, there is no linear operator that would satisfy the requirement of operator times Green's function equaling delta. This is because the field in this case satisfies a nonlinear equation. Therefore, these functions are considered correlations rather than Green's functions, except in the case of a free particle. Additionally, all Green's functions in QFT are inverses of the same operator, but with different boundary conditions. In Schwinger's work, he defines and calculates an operator G which is the Green's function of the corresponding equation (Dirac or Klein-Gordon).
  • #1
jordi
197
14
The Feynman propagator:

$$D_{F}(x,y) = <0|T\{\phi_{0}(x) \phi_{0}(y)\}|0> $$

is the Green's function of the operator (except maybe for a constant):

$$ (\Box + m^2)$$

In other words:

$$ (\Box + m^2) D_{F}(x,y) = - i \hbar \delta^{4}(x-y)$$

My question is:

Which is the operator that corresponds to:

$$<\Omega |T\{\phi(x) \phi(y)\}|\Omega> $$

being the Green's function (understood as "operator times Green's function equals to delta") in QFT?

I assume that the answer to my question has something to do with the Schwinger-Dyson equations, but I cannot find it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If ##\phi(x)## is a non-free interacting field, then it satisfies a nonlinear equation, e.g. ##(\Box+m^2)\phi(x)+\lambda\phi^3(x)=0##. Hence there is no linear operator that would satisfy your requirement.
 
  • Like
Likes jordi
  • #3
Demystifier said:
If ##\phi(x)## is a non-free interacting field, then it satisfies a nonlinear equation, e.g. ##(\Box+m^2)\phi(x)+\lambda\phi^3(x)=0##. Hence there is no linear operator that would satisfy your requirement.
In QFT, this equation is ill-defined.
 
  • Like
Likes jordi
  • #4
Demystifier said:
If ##\phi(x)## is a non-free interacting field, then it satisfies a nonlinear equation, e.g. ##(\Box+m^2)\phi(x)+\lambda\phi^3(x)=0##. Hence there is no linear operator that would satisfy your requirement.

It does not need to be linear, the operator could be non-linear.
 
  • #5
Could one say that these functions are then correlations but not Green functions (except in the free case)?
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #6
jordi said:
Could one say that these functions are then correlations but not Green functions (except in the free case)?

Pretty much. Sometimes people still call them "Green's functions" even though they satisfy a nonlinear equation like the one Demystifier gave, but this is an abuse of language since Green's functions are technically only defined for linear operators.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and jordi
  • #7
jordi said:
Which is the operator that corresponds to:
$$<\Omega |T\{\phi(x) \phi(y)\}|\Omega> $$
being the Green's function (understood as "operator times Green's function equals to delta") in QFT?
All Green's functions are inverses of the same operator, but with different bounday condiions.
 
  • Like
Likes jordi
  • #8
Can you please provide more background to your answer?
 
  • #9
jordi said:
Can you please provide more background to your answer?
The boundary conditions depend on the complex integration path in the inversion formula. See here.
 
  • Like
Likes jordi
  • #10
Not sure if it is what you are asking for, but in "on gauge invariance and vacuum polarization" (1951) Schwinger defines and calculates an operator G with $$\left\langle x\right|G\left|x'\right\rangle =G(x,x')$$ where the right hand side is the Green's function of the corresponding equation (Dirac or Klein-Gordon).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and jordi
  • #11
Does it correspond to the free or to the "full-perturbative" equation?
 
  • #12
You can find the exact solutions to G in the case of the free particle and a particle under the effect of some "classical" electromagnetic field configurations. I think that's the best that can be done non-perturbatively.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

1. What is the Green function in QFT?

The Green function in QFT, also known as the propagator, is a mathematical tool used to calculate the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one point to another in a quantum field theory. It is a fundamental concept in QFT and is used to describe the behavior of particles in a quantum field.

2. How is the Green function related to operators in QFT?

The Green function is related to operators in QFT through the Feynman propagator, which is a specific type of Green function. The Feynman propagator is used to calculate the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one point to another in a quantum field theory, and it is constructed from the operators associated with the field.

3. What is the role of the Green function in QFT calculations?

The Green function plays a crucial role in QFT calculations as it allows us to calculate the probability amplitudes for various particle interactions and processes. It is used to solve equations of motion and to calculate scattering amplitudes, making it an essential tool for understanding the behavior of particles in quantum field theory.

4. How do different operators correspond to different Green functions in QFT?

In QFT, different operators correspond to different Green functions because they represent different physical processes. For example, the scalar field operator corresponds to the scalar propagator, while the vector field operator corresponds to the vector propagator. The type of operator used depends on the specific physical process being studied.

5. Are there any limitations to using the Green function in QFT calculations?

While the Green function is a powerful tool in QFT, it does have some limitations. It is only applicable to systems that can be described by a quantum field theory, and it may not accurately describe interactions at very high energies. Additionally, the Green function approach is not always the most efficient method for solving certain problems in QFT, and other techniques may be more suitable.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
393
Replies
10
Views
642
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
789
Replies
1
Views
656
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
127
Back
Top