Which OS consume least memory and HD space

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silicon Waffle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Memory Os Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on operating systems (OS) that consume minimal memory and hard drive space while remaining functional. Notable mentions include Damn Small Linux, Arch ARM Linux, and lightweight distributions like Lubuntu, Bodhi Linux, and Peppermint Linux, all of which operate efficiently with less than 200 MB of RAM on boot. The Raspberry Pi 2, equipped with 1.0 GB of memory, is highlighted as an ideal platform for running these lightweight OS options. The conversation emphasizes the need to define what constitutes a 'completely functional' OS based on user requirements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Linux distributions, specifically lightweight options like Lubuntu and Bodhi Linux.
  • Familiarity with Raspberry Pi hardware specifications and capabilities.
  • Knowledge of embedded systems and their requirements.
  • Basic concepts of memory management in operating systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the features and performance of Damn Small Linux for minimal installations.
  • Explore the capabilities of Arch ARM Linux for embedded applications.
  • Investigate the differences between lightweight Linux distributions such as Lubuntu and Peppermint Linux.
  • Learn about real-time operating systems and their applications in embedded systems.
USEFUL FOR

System administrators, embedded system developers, and users seeking efficient operating systems for low-resource environments will benefit from this discussion.

Silicon Waffle
Messages
160
Reaction score
202
I am curious as to which OS and its siblings (e.g Linux={Fedora, Mint,...}) consume the least memory and HD space but sure are still perfectly functional after installed.
Thanks a lot.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
Completely functional does not have to mean every extra possible add on command and driver - ARCH ARM Linux is meant for tiny hardware configurations, like your refrigerator "brain" or the ignition system in your car. Extreme examples run a functioning kernel with just a few device drivers that occupies less than ~50MB, with addressable memory (space to run code) at about 30-50% of that value. Check out a Raspberry Pi 2 with really expanded memory -- 1.0 GB. - They are about $US40 I think.

So you may want to reconsider what makes a good 'completely functional' definition. Just like full blown Debian or Solaris? OR something else. Programming the fridge, maybe.

http://www.raspberrypi.org/raspberry-pi-2-on-sale/
 
jim mcnamara said:
Check out a Raspberry Pi 2 with really expanded memory -- 1.0 GB. - They are about $US40 I think.
So you may want to reconsider what makes a good 'completely functional' definition. Just like full blown Debian or Solaris? OR something else. Programming the fridge, maybe.

http://www.raspberrypi.org/raspberry-pi-2-on-sale/

I'm converting some SPI kernel device drivers (daq_gert driver for the comedi library) written for the original RPi on a RPi 2. The difference in compile speed of the 1GB models is amazing with 4 cores. If you need a full blown embedded system with Raspbian that can be stripped down to run on something even smaller it's a great choice.
 
I'd say go with Linux Ubunto. Not only is it good and many people use it, but it's free and really user friendly. :)
 
Technically MS-DOS would fit your criteria, but I think you'll have trouble with compatibility with the programs you want to run. :-p
 
Lubuntu (the lightweight version of Ubuntu), Bodhi Linux, Peppermint Linux come to mind. They all consume less than 200 Mb of RAM on boot up, have several programs pre-installed (is that what you mean by being functional?) and if you need other programs, it's very easy to install them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
10K
Replies
35
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
60
Views
11K
Replies
29
Views
5K