Which pairs of these diagrams represent equivalent circuits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter syllll_213
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying equivalent circuit diagrams based on Kirchhoff's Current Law and voltage considerations. Participants analyze diagrams Y and Z, concluding they are equivalent because current divides similarly in both. The distinction between diagrams Y and Z is highlighted, noting that Y has four connections while Z has only two, raising questions about their equivalence. The importance of visualizing voltage equipotentials in circuit analysis is emphasized. Ultimately, the conclusion is that W and Z are equivalent circuits, while further analysis is needed for X and Y.
syllll_213
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Circuit
Relevant Equations
I(in) = I (out)
Screenshot 2025-05-06 at 8.38.00 pm.webp

Hi, I came across this question and I wonder if my option is correct? I was thinking in Y and Z the current both divide (Kirchoff's Current Law) so they should be the same, while in X the current does not seem to divide and in Y I am struggling to visualise the division or current flow...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You get to pick more than one of the choices (and you should).
 
In circuit diagrams, connections are ideal wires with zero resistance, so a node consists of the entire section of wire between elements, not just a single point. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Node_(circuits))
 
I think that, instead of considering Kirchhoff's current law, it would be easier to see what's going on if you considered the voltage law and that straight lines in circuit depiction represent equipotentials regardless of their shape. You can see that in all four diagrams one side of elements A-D is at the same potential. In W and Z the other side of A is at the same potential as the other side of B and the other side of C is at the same potential as the other side as D. Thus, as you have correctly concluded, W and Z are equivalent.

Now apply the same reasoning to X and Y.
 
syllll_213 said:
I was thinking in Y and Z the current both divide (Kirchoff's Current Law) so they should be the same
You could start with the 'easy' feature: Y has four external connections but Z has only two. So can they be equivalent?

Here's an exercise for you. There is a 'black box' with four terminals:

1746538655911.webp


The only components inside the black box are 4 perfectly conducting wires connected like this:
1746538310052.webp


Which (zero, one or more) of the following circuits (also made of perfectly conducting wires) is/are equivalent to the above circuit?
(By ‘equivalent’ we mean that we can’t tell which circuit is inside the black box – equivalent circuits behave the same as each other.)

1746538487545.webp


1746538569143.webp
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top