MHB Which Quadrant Contains No Solutions to This System of Inequalities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kamranpiriyev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The system of inequalities y ≥ 2x + 1 and y > x/2 - 1 is analyzed to determine which quadrant contains no solutions. The discussion reveals that quadrants I, II, and III contain solutions, while quadrant IV does not. There is confusion regarding the correct answer, with some participants believing there are solutions in all quadrants. However, the consensus is that quadrant IV is indeed the one without solutions. The final conclusion confirms that quadrant IV is the correct answer.
kamranpiriyev
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If the system of inequalities y ≥ 2x + 1 and y> x/2-1
is graphed in the xy-plane above, which
quadrant contains no solutions to the system?
A) Quadrant II
B) Quadrant III
C) Quadrant IV
D) There are solutions in all four quadrants.


I thing the answer is D . But book says that it is C. I think C is wrong 'cause from the second inequality we can get (1;-1/2) or (2;-1) which are in 4 quadrant
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
?? No, they are not! -\frac{1}{2} is NOT larger than 2\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)+ 1= 0. And -1 is NOT larger than 2\left(2\right)+ 1= 5.<br /> <br /> Is it possible that you are thinking &quot;(y, x)&quot; rather than &quot;(x, y)&quot;?
 
kamranpiriyev said:
If the system of inequalities y ≥ 2x + 1 and y> x/2-1
is graphed in the xy-plane above, which
quadrant contains no solutions to the system?
A) Quadrant II
B) Quadrant III
C) Quadrant IV
D) There are solutions in all four quadrants.


I thing the answer is D . But book says that it is C. I think C is wrong 'cause from the second inequality we can get (1;-1/2) or (2;-1) which are in 4 quadrant

Let's graph the system of inequalities:

[desmos="-10,10,-10,10"]y\ge2x+1;y\gt x/2-1[/desmos]

From this we can see quadrants I-III contain solutions, and quadrant IV has no solutions. :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top