cmb
- 1,128
- 128
It still strikes me that this makes more sense as a fuelling option. Like a comment above says, the exhaust temp is hotter. Note; hotter exhaust doesn't necessarily mean there is more heat (as in thermal energy) passing through the exhaust manifold, because there are less combustion gases flowing.
My guess for what you end up with is; a) a more enriched combustion in those cylinders that are fuelled (guaranteeing better cold weather combustion), and b) a lower throughput of combustion gases, thus hotter exhaust (because you still have to generate the same power to idle the engine at the same speed, you're just doing it with less exhaust gas volume), thus maximising transfer of exhaust thermal energy to the exhaust side of the engine - thus faster warm-up.
So there is extra fuel going into each cylinder, but not necessarily the engine as a whole. In fact, I think the total fuel going in would probably be less (if we were talking about equivalent idle speeds) because the volumetric efficiency of the fuelled cylinders would be equivalently higher with more fuel [higher combustion temperature] being fed into each.
I do feel the 'extra-load-on-the-engine' argument for why it is used to be illogical, because you either have enough power generated that matches the idling loads, or you don't in which case the idle speed changes. The idling loads are much the same, same pumping losses, same compressive loads, same friction loads for the idling speed. What extra loads can there be when you don't fuel some of those cylinders?
My guess for what you end up with is; a) a more enriched combustion in those cylinders that are fuelled (guaranteeing better cold weather combustion), and b) a lower throughput of combustion gases, thus hotter exhaust (because you still have to generate the same power to idle the engine at the same speed, you're just doing it with less exhaust gas volume), thus maximising transfer of exhaust thermal energy to the exhaust side of the engine - thus faster warm-up.
So there is extra fuel going into each cylinder, but not necessarily the engine as a whole. In fact, I think the total fuel going in would probably be less (if we were talking about equivalent idle speeds) because the volumetric efficiency of the fuelled cylinders would be equivalently higher with more fuel [higher combustion temperature] being fed into each.
I do feel the 'extra-load-on-the-engine' argument for why it is used to be illogical, because you either have enough power generated that matches the idling loads, or you don't in which case the idle speed changes. The idling loads are much the same, same pumping losses, same compressive loads, same friction loads for the idling speed. What extra loads can there be when you don't fuel some of those cylinders?