Which Tax Basis Best Balances Economic Goals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the merits of different taxation methods, particularly the shift from income tax to consumption tax as proposed by Huckabee. Participants express concerns that consumption taxes may discourage spending and saving, while others argue for a mix of taxes, including property and sales taxes, to ensure adequate government revenue. The fairness of tax burdens on the wealthy versus the poor is debated, with some advocating for a progressive tax system while others suggest a flat tax approach. The complexities of enforcing various taxes and the implications of government deficit spending are also highlighted, with some arguing that the current system, despite its flaws, functions adequately. Ultimately, the conversation reflects a deep concern about the balance between tax fairness, economic impact, and government revenue needs.
  • #121
Generally, in a tribal setting, those who are more able... give more... it isn't legislated away from them... they give more because their catch needs processing and they can't do the processing themselves so they give a percentage to the people helping to process the catch (buffalo, fish, money (whathaveyou). As I said, a monetary system costs millions if not billions to maintain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
stewartcs said:
How does the airline industry not pass along cost again? Last time I flew I had to pay 15$ to check my bag and $5 for a "snack and drink". I didn't have to pay for that in years past.

For some years after Sept. 11 the airlines were able to pass along almost none of the cost increases. At the moment they still haven't been able to pass much along. Essentially the only increases have been the surchanges you mention. And there was a good period where they couldn't even manage that.

There's no law stopping them from charging more for fares, they just haven't been able to sell enough tickets when they do. The surcharges allow for second-degree price discrimination which makes raising prices somewhat easier.
 
  • #123
stewartcs said:
To take the approach that those more able have more to lose simply because they own more "stuff" (property, cars, boats, whatever) if the government falls into anarchy is, in my opinion, misguided.

Why?
 
  • #124
For an outside perspective:
http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2008/01/four-goals-of-tax-policy.html

1. Efficiency: The tax system should distort incentives as little as possible (and, in the case of externalities and Pigovian taxes, correct incentives when necessary).

2. Intergenerational equity: The tax system should raise enough revenue so current generations do not unduly burden future generations.

3. Egalitarianism: The tax system should try to achieve a more equal distribution of after-tax incomes.

4. Stabilization: The tax system should help maintain the economy at full employment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
13K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K