Which Textbook References Hamiltonian Systems with Equal Orbit Periods?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reference Request
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Hamiltonian system with equal orbit periods, specifically referencing the theorem that states all orbits at the same energy level have identical periods. The participants identify "Foundations of Mechanics" by Abraham and Marsden as a key textbook containing this theorem, specifically problem 5.2G on page 401 of the second edition. The conversation also touches on the relevance of the Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equation and action-angle variables in understanding this concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equation
  • Knowledge of action-angle variables
  • Basic concepts of closed orbits in dynamical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equation in detail
  • Explore action-angle variables and their applications in Hamiltonian systems
  • Review problem 5.2G in "Foundations of Mechanics" by Abraham and Marsden
  • Investigate the implications of the period-energy relation in Hamiltonian dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, dynamical systems, and Hamiltonian theory.

wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,245
Reaction score
1,052
There is a nice fact. It approximately sounds like that: Let ##H=H(p,q)## be a Hamiltonian system with ##n## degrees of freedom such that all its orbits are closed. Then the periods of all the orbits belonging to the same energy level are the same.

Please which textbook does contain this? I know the proof I need only reference
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this a direct consequence of the Hamilton Jacobi partial differential equation? Then one can quote any textbook treating the HJPDE.
 
I need to think my proof does not refer the Hamilton Jacobi partial differential equation
 
Well, if you have an own proof, why do you need a reference? It's hard to give a reference for a proof, you haven't shown to me ;-).
 
vanhees71 said:
Well, if you have an own proof, why do you need a reference?
because I do not want to enlarge the volume of my text by rewriting of well-known things
And I have no idea how to employ the Hamilton Jacobi eq. which is local in its nature
 
Would a textbook with a decent treatment of action-angle variables be enough? I assume the proof is along those lines given the reliance on closed orbits.
 
wrobel said:
because I do not want to enlarge the volume of my text by rewriting of well-known things
And I have no idea how to employ the Hamilton Jacobi eq. which is local in its nature
Then I don't understand what you want to prove.
 
Haborix said:
Would a textbook with a decent treatment of action-angle variables be enough? I assume the proof is along those lines given the reliance on closed orbits.
I think the existence of the action-angle variables needs to be proved first
I just actually asked for a reference I did not have an intention to organize a challenge :)

Thank you everybody.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't recall anything framed in the way you put it, so I was hoping it might be a corollary of a theorem more common. I think the theorem you describe is part of an exercise in "Foundations of Mechanics" by Abraham and Marsden. It is problem 5.2G on p. 401 in the second edition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and wrobel
  • #10
Great! this is called "period-energy" relation. p. 198 That is exactly what I asked for. thanks a lot
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #11
Haborix said:
It is problem 5.2G
solution to the problem:
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haborix and vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K