I Which Textbook References Hamiltonian Systems with Equal Orbit Periods?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reference Request
AI Thread Summary
In Hamiltonian systems with n degrees of freedom, all closed orbits at the same energy level share the same period, which is known as the "period-energy" relation. A reference for this concept can be found in "Foundations of Mechanics" by Abraham and Marsden, specifically in problem 5.2G on page 401 of the second edition. The discussion also touches on the Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equation and its local nature, with participants expressing uncertainty about its application in their proofs. The need for concise references to avoid redundancy in explanations is emphasized. Overall, the conversation centers around finding appropriate sources for established results in Hamiltonian mechanics.
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,126
Reaction score
982
There is a nice fact. It approximately sounds like that: Let ##H=H(p,q)## be a Hamiltonian system with ##n## degrees of freedom such that all its orbits are closed. Then the periods of all the orbits belonging to the same energy level are the same.

Please which textbook does contain this? I know the proof I need only reference
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this a direct consequence of the Hamilton Jacobi partial differential equation? Then one can quote any textbook treating the HJPDE.
 
I need to think my proof does not refer the Hamilton Jacobi partial differential equation
 
Well, if you have an own proof, why do you need a reference? It's hard to give a reference for a proof, you haven't shown to me ;-).
 
vanhees71 said:
Well, if you have an own proof, why do you need a reference?
because I do not want to enlarge the volume of my text by rewriting of well-known things
And I have no idea how to employ the Hamilton Jacobi eq. which is local in its nature
 
Would a textbook with a decent treatment of action-angle variables be enough? I assume the proof is along those lines given the reliance on closed orbits.
 
wrobel said:
because I do not want to enlarge the volume of my text by rewriting of well-known things
And I have no idea how to employ the Hamilton Jacobi eq. which is local in its nature
Then I don't understand what you want to prove.
 
Haborix said:
Would a textbook with a decent treatment of action-angle variables be enough? I assume the proof is along those lines given the reliance on closed orbits.
I think the existence of the action-angle variables needs to be proved first
I just actually asked for a reference I did not have an intention to organize a challenge :)

Thank you everybody.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't recall anything framed in the way you put it, so I was hoping it might be a corollary of a theorem more common. I think the theorem you describe is part of an exercise in "Foundations of Mechanics" by Abraham and Marsden. It is problem 5.2G on p. 401 in the second edition.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and wrobel
  • #10
Great! this is called "period-energy" relation. p. 198 That is exactly what I asked for. thanks a lot
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #11
Haborix said:
It is problem 5.2G
solution to the problem:
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes Haborix and vanhees71
Back
Top