Who Ages More in the Inverse Twin Paradox?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the aging effects experienced by rockets 'B' and 'C' in the context of the Inverse Twin Paradox, with both rockets initially moving at gamma=10. When rocket 'C' continues while rocket 'B' stops and later accelerates, the accumulated times reveal that rocket 'B' ages 10 years, while rocket 'C' ages 12.5 years. The analysis employs a spacetime geometric approach, utilizing four-vectors and the spacetime interval to calculate proper time experienced by each clock. The results confirm that the aging discrepancy persists regardless of the inertial frame chosen.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly time dilation and the twin paradox.
  • Familiarity with spacetime geometry and four-vectors.
  • Knowledge of gamma factor calculations in relativistic physics.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving spacetime intervals and proper time.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the twin paradox in different inertial frames.
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of four-vectors in special relativity.
  • Explore the concept of proper time and its significance in relativistic scenarios.
  • Investigate the effects of acceleration on time dilation in non-inertial frames.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on relativity, spacetime concepts, and time dilation effects in high-velocity scenarios.

granpa
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
7
suppose we have a stationary observer 'A' at the origin. at t=0 rockets 'B' and 'C' pass the origin moving at gamma=10 but rocket B stops. when rocket 'C' reaches some point along the x-axis rocket 'B' accelerates to gamma=10 as measured by rocket 'C'. when rockets 'B' and 'C' meet its over. who ages more, rocket 'B' or 'C'? let us also assume that there exists a long line of evenly spaced clocks, perfectly synchronized to observer 'A', along the x axis.

obviously if rocket 'C' is considered to be stationary then we just have the twins paradox. but what is the result if we look at it from a different point of view? obviously the result should be the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
granpa said:
suppose we have a stationary observer 'A' at the origin. at t=0 rockets 'B' and 'C' pass the origin moving at gamma=10 but rocket B stops. when rocket 'C' reaches some point along the x-axis rocket 'B' accelerates to gamma=10 as measured by rocket 'C'. when rockets 'B' and 'C' meet its over. who ages more, rocket 'B' or 'C'? let us also assume that there exists a long line of evenly spaced clocks, perfectly synchronized to observer 'A', along the x axis.

obviously if rocket 'C' is considered to be stationary then we just have the twins paradox. but what is the result if we look at it from a different point of view? obviously the result should be the same.
As always I would recommend the spacetime geometric approach. Here is an example, I used v = .6 c (gamma = 1.25) so that plotting it is easier and picked the inertial reference frame where A is at rest. Units of time are years and units of distance are lightyears so that c = 1.

Recall that the four-vector is (ct,x) and that the spacetime interval along a four-vector dr = (c dt,dx) is ds² = c²dt²-dx² = dr.dr and that ds/c is the proper time experienced by a clock moving along dr.

a0 = b0 = c0 = (0,0)
a1 = b1 = (5,0)
c1 = (5,3)
a2 = (15.625,0)
b2 = c2 = (15.625,9.375)

Let da1=a1-a0 and da2 = a2-a1 then total accumulated time on clock A is:
sqrt(da1.da1)/c + sqrt(da2.da2)/c = sqrt(5²-0²) + sqrt(10.625²-0²) = 15.625

Let db1=b1-b0 and db2 = b2-b1 then total accumulated time on clock B is:
sqrt(db1.db1)/c + sqrt(db2.db2)/c = sqrt(5²-0²) + sqrt(10.625²-9.375²) = 10

Let dc1=c1-c0 and dc2 = c2-c1 then total accumulated time on clock C is:
sqrt(dc1.dc1)/c + sqrt(dc2.dc2)/c = sqrt(5²-3²) + sqrt(10.625²-6.375²) = 12.5

I will leave it as an exercise for you to show that the intervals are the same in the inertial frame where C is at rest.
 

Attachments

  • twins.GIF
    twins.GIF
    5.1 KB · Views: 521

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K