Who Invented the Mathematical Operators Used in Classical Electromagnetism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Del History
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The gradient, divergence, curl, and Laplacian operators are foundational to classical electromagnetism, with their origins traced back to William Rowan Hamilton's work on quaternions. The modern vector analysis and notation were significantly developed by Josiah Willard Gibbs in the 1880s, gaining widespread acceptance by 1910. P. G. Tait contributed to the standardization of the nabla symbol, which Hamilton initially introduced in various forms. Michael Crowe's book on the history of vector analysis provides further insights into these developments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus concepts such as gradient, divergence, and curl.
  • Familiarity with historical mathematical figures like William Rowan Hamilton and Josiah Willard Gibbs.
  • Knowledge of quaternions and their applications in vector analysis.
  • Awareness of mathematical notation evolution, particularly in the context of electromagnetism.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical contributions of William Rowan Hamilton to vector calculus.
  • Explore the development of vector analysis by Josiah Willard Gibbs.
  • Study the applications of quaternions in modern physics and engineering.
  • Read Michael Crowe's "A History of Vector Analysis" for a comprehensive overview.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, electrical engineers, and students interested in the historical development of mathematical operators in electromagnetism.

snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
The gradient, divergence, curl and Laplacian operators are so much a part of classical electromagnetism, I was wondering: what is their history? Who invented them? Newton? Laplace? Maxwell himself?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snoopies622 said:
The gradient, divergence, curl and Laplacian operators are so much a part of classical electromagnetism, I was wondering: what is their history? Who invented them? Newton? Laplace? Maxwell himself?

The first root of modern-day vectorial analysis and notation can be traced back to Hamilton's work on quaternions.

Maxwell and others used what they found useful here, without much standardization.

Generally, fully modern vector analysis (and, PRESUMABLY, vectorial notation) was developed by Gibbs in the 1880s, but with general acceptance around 1910.

There exists a largely acclaimed book on the History of Vecor Analysis by Michael Crowe;
you may order it from amazon.com here:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486679101/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Having looked a bit furter, I found the following link:
http://jeff560.tripod.com/calculus.html

Here, it is clear that Hamilton was the first to introduce the del operator, but that Tait was the one to rotate Hamilton's symbol 90 degrees into its modern shape.
Some uncertainty exists whether it was Tait or Maxwell who dubbed it "nabla":
VECTOR CALCULUS SYMBOLS
For vector analysis entries on the Words pages, see here for a list.

The vector differential operator, now written and called nabla or del, was introduced by William Rowan Hamilton (1805-1865). Hamilton wrote the operator as and it was P. G. Tait who established as the conventional symbol--see his An Elementary Treatise on Quaternions (1867). Tait was also responsible for establishing the term nabla. See NABLA on the Earliest Uses of Words page.

David Wilkins suggests that Hamilton may have used the nabla as a general purpose symbol or abbreviation for whatever operator he wanted to introduce at any time. In 1837 Hamilton used the nabla, in its modern orientation, as a symbol for any arbitrary function in Trans. R. Irish Acad. XVII. 236. (OED.) He used the nabla to signify a permutation operator in "On the Argument of Abel, respecting the Impossibility of expressing a Root of any General Equation above the Fourth Degree, by any finite Combination of Radicals and Rational Functions," Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, 18 (1839), pp. 171-259.

Hamilton used the rotated nabla, i.e. , for the vector differential operator in the "Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy" for the meeting of July 20, 1846. This paper appeared in volume 3 (1847), pp. 273-292. Hamilton also used the rotated nabla as the vector differential operator in "On Quaternions; or on a new System of Imaginaries in Algebra"; which he published in instalments in the Philosophical Magazine between 1844 and 1850. The relevant portion of the paper consists of articles 49-50, in the instalment which appeared in October 1847 in volume 31 (3rd series, 1847) of the Philosophical Magazine, pp. 278-283. A footnote in vol. 31, page 291, reads:
...
In that paper designed for Southampton the characteristic was written ; but this more common sign has been so often used with other meanings, that it seems desirable to abstain from appropriating it to the new signification here proposed.
Wilkins writes that "that paper" refers to an unpublished paper that Hamilton had prepared for a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, but which had been forwarded by mistake to Sir John Herschel's home address, not to the meeting itself in Southampton, and which therefore was not communicated at that meeting. The footnote indicates that Hamilton had originally intended to use the nabla symbol that is used today but then decided to rotate it to avoid confusion with other uses of the symbol.
The rotated form appears in Hamilton's magnum opus, the Lectures on Quaternions (1853, p. 610).


The standard reference work for mathematical notation seems to be Florian Cajori's work "A History of Mathematical Notations" in two volumes, originally published in the late 1920's:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1602066841/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks arildno - those are great references!
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
559
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K