Understanding the del operator in electromagnetics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Del Operator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the del operator in electromagnetics, specifically addressing its application to scalar and vector fields, and the implications of spatial dependence in these contexts. Participants explore mathematical definitions and notations associated with the gradient, divergence, and curl, as well as their interpretations in physical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Alan questions whether scalar and vector fields imply spatial dependence, suggesting that their values vary at different points in space if they are not constant.
  • Alan asks if gradient, divergence, and curl are point functions, implying that each point yields different results.
  • Alan seeks clarification on the notation of \nabla and \nabla' in electromagnetics, expressing confusion about their respective roles concerning source and field points.
  • Some participants affirm that scalar and vector fields can indeed have different values at distinct points, but caution that this does not exclude the possibility of constant functions.
  • Jason provides a mathematical explanation of the notation involving \nabla and \nabla', detailing how they relate to functions of both source and field points, and offers analogous examples from kinetic theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical definitions of scalar and vector fields as functions of space, but there remains some confusion and lack of consensus regarding the specific implications of the del operator notation in electromagnetics.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the interpretation of the del operator in different contexts, particularly in relation to source and field points, and the implications of spatial dependence in scalar and vector fields.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Gradient is the derivative of a scalar field. Divergence and Curl are both derivative of a vector field.

1) Are "scalar field" and "vector field" imply it is spatial dependent...ie they are function of any single point in space...ie the value of scalar and vector field is different at every single point in space if it is not a constant field.

2) Does this mean all three ( Gradient, Div, Curl ) are point form?...ie each point give different result.

3) Is "point form" means the function is different at every single individual point in space?

4) In electromagnetics, there are \nabla' that represent operation respect to source point and \nabla represent operation respect to field point of interest. I am confuse with this. Can anyone explain this?I just want to have a clearer understanding of the del operator.

Thanks

Alan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From a mathematical point of view, the answers to your first three questions are all yes. I'll leave your last question to a physicist.
 
mathman said:
From a mathematical point of view, the answers to your first three questions are all yes. I'll leave your last question to a physicist.

Thanks for clearing these up.

Alan
 
Be careful. When saying that something is a function of space means that it can have a different value at each point. It does not follow that it cannot have the same value at two distinct points nor does it mean the function cannot be a "constant" function- the same at all points.
 
yungman said:
4) In electromagnetics, there are \nabla' that represent operation respect to source point and \nabla represent operation respect to field point of interest. I am confuse with this. Can anyone explain this?

Essentially, in this case there is a function g of both \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) and \mathbf{r'}=(x',y',z'). In other words

g(\mathbf{r,r'}) = g(x,y,z,x',y',z').

Here is what the notation you asked about means:

\nabla g(\mathbf{r, r'}) = \hat{x} \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} + \hat{y} \frac{\partial g}{\partial y} + \hat{z} \frac{\partial g}{\partial z}

\nabla' g(\mathbf{r, r'}) = \hat{x} \frac{\partial g}{\partial x'} + \hat{y} \frac{\partial g}{\partial y'} + \hat{z} \frac{\partial g}{\partial z'}

Yes, the primed coordinates are very often used for source locations.

Similar kinds of notation can be used as well in other contexts. For example, in kinetic theory we see functions of position, velocity and time, f(\mathbf{r,v},t). Here \mathbf{v} = (v_x, v_y, v_z). In this case,

\nabla f(\mathbf{r, v},t) = \hat{x} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} + \hat{y} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} + \hat{z} \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}

\nabla_{\mathbf{v}} f(\mathbf{r, v},t) = \hat{x} \frac{\partial f}{\partial v_x} + \hat{y} \frac{\partial f}{\partial v_y} + \hat{z} \frac{\partial f}{\partial v_z}


Good luck,

Jason
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K