Who Plays Saxophone? - Questions on Resonance Modes

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anton Alice
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the acoustic behavior of the alto saxophone, particularly focusing on resonance modes and the effects of partially blocking the neck with a finger. Participants explore the implications of these actions on pitch and tonal characteristics, with a mix of theoretical and practical insights.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that inserting a finger into the neck of the saxophone reduces the frequency of the sound produced, despite the expectation that it would increase due to a shorter resonator length.
  • Another participant suggests that the observed pitch is likely an overtone rather than the fundamental frequency, indicating that the mode of oscillation changes when the finger is inserted.
  • Questions arise about why higher frequency overtones might be damped more as the finger is inserted, with some suggesting that the spectrum of overtones could depend on the depth of the finger's intrusion.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of playing low notes on reeded instruments, particularly in relation to maintaining control over pitch and avoiding jumping to higher harmonics.
  • Participants discuss the challenges associated with reed hardness affecting tone production, particularly for low notes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the relationship between finger intrusion and frequency changes, with multiple competing views on how the resonant modes are affected. There is no consensus on the exact mechanisms at play or the nature of the observed phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of experimental verification by some participants, as well as the dependence on individual experiences with saxophone playing and reed characteristics.

Who May Find This Useful

Musicians, particularly saxophonists, and those interested in the physics of musical instruments may find this discussion relevant.

Anton Alice
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
Hello people,

I have started 2 days ago with alto saxophone, since I have to take a year off violin because of several shoulder injuries due to overpractise.

I observed a strange thing with the sax, which I would like to discuss with you:

The sax is delivered in three parts: mouthpiece, saxophone neck, and the the heavy body.
Sometimes it is useful to practice sax separately on the mouthpiece, without the body.
I have done that with the mouthpiece + neck, so I put the mouthpiece onto the neck, and practiced toot-technique. What I observed was the following:

If you blow into it, then you will hear some resonance note. Now if you put your finger from the other side into the neck, then the frequency goes down. Of course the finger does not completely close the neck, so that air can still pass by.
The naive expectation would be, that the frequency goes up, because the length of the resonator has become shorter? (apparently?)

Why does the frequency go down?

EDIT:

I use the index finger, because it fits into the neck, such that air can still travel past.
Maybe the reason is, that the finger has a certain thickness, and the resonant modes are not simply excitations along the length of the neck, but also along the thickness (diameter). But why should the freq decrease, if the thickness decreases? (The thickness only decreases in that section, where the finger has been intruded. The finger can not be intruded all the way up to the mouthpiece)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you introduce your finger into the end of the tube you do three things:
  1. Reduce the length of the tube: this would tend to decrease the fundamental wavelength and raise the pitch proportionately
  2. Close the end of the tube: this would tend to halve the fundamental wavelength and increase the pitch by an octave
  3. Change the tonal characteristics i.e. change the amount by which different modes of oscillation are damped
As 1 and 2 increase the frequency but you observe the opposite you can conclude that the pitch you are hearing with the open tube is not the fundamental pitch but an overtone; when you insert your finger the mode of oscillation completely changes (with the fundamental changing from 1/4 wave to 1/2 wave) and a lower overtone becomes dominant.
 
Why should the higher freqs in the overtones be damped more, the more the finger is intruded?
I mean it could also be the case, that the low-freq overtones are damped away, so that the avarage heard impression goes up.
Another way of asking: Why should the spectrum of overtones depend on the penetration depth exactly in such a way that deepening the finger leads to lowering the freq?
MrAnchovy said:
when you insert your finger the mode of oscillation completely changes (with the fundamental changing from 1/4 wave to 1/2 wave)
If I intrude the finger slightly, then the freq goes down slightly, while the character of the tone does not change too much. So it is not that the "mode of oscillation changes completely". The characteristics do change gradually, very gradually as the finger goes deeper into the neck. What you are describing would lead to a sudden change of characteristics.

MrAnchovy said:
you can conclude that the pitch you are hearing with the open tube is not the fundamental pitch but an overtone;
Why Am I not able to excite the fundamental?
 
Last edited:
Do my questions make sense?
 
Anton Alice said:
Why should the higher freqs in the overtones be damped more, the more the finger is intruded?
I mean it could also be the case, that the low-freq overtones are damped away, so that the avarage heard impression goes up.
It could be, but experience shows that in general higher frequency sounds are more easily damped.

Anton Alice said:
Another way of asking: Why should the spectrum of overtones depend on the penetration depth exactly in such a way that deepening the finger leads to lowering the freq?

If I intrude the finger slightly, then the freq goes down slightly, while the character of the tone does not change too much.
That is strange - I must admit I haven't got a sax here to experiment with, I was just trying to explain your observations.
Anton Alice said:
So it is not that the "mode of oscillation changes completely". The characteristics do change gradually, very gradually as the finger goes deeper into the neck. What you are describing would lead to a sudden change of characteristics.
Yes indeed, something else must be happening which I can't explain.
Anton Alice said:
Why Am I not able to excite the fundamental?
Again this was an idea to explain the observation - note that it is often hard to play low notes on reeded instruments, particularly quietly or very loudly, without breaking up an octave. A good site for the physics of musical instruments is http://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/music/
 
MrAnchovy said:
Again this was an idea to explain the observation - note that it is often hard to play low notes on reeded instruments, particularly quietly
Ouh yes, this is exactly what I am struggling with for a day. The damn lower C always jumps to the first harmonic. Especially when I am trying to do it quietly, because of neighbors.
 
Anton Alice said:
Ouh yes, this is exactly what I am struggling with for a day. The damn lower C always jumps to the first harmonic. Especially when I am trying to do it quietly, because of neighbors.
Not unusual. You are in the situation that:
  • If the reed you are using is too soft, squeaking is a common problem
  • If the reed is too hard, the low tones are hard to get to speak.
Try pushing a lot of air through the instrument without making a sound. Then, when you are ready, play low F and hold it. When that tone is stable, change suddenly to low C.

For more information and saxophone-related stuff, consult http://www.saxontheweb.net/.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K