Who was Stieltjes and how did he contribute to the Riemann-Stieltjes integral?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical context and mathematical significance of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral, including inquiries about the contributions of Thomas Johannes Stieltjes and the relationship between his work and that of Bernhard Riemann. Participants express confusion regarding the definitions and properties of these integrals, as well as the fundamental theorem associated with them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the Riemann-Stieltjes integral differs from the Riemann integral, highlighting that it uses a function \(\alpha\) that can be any increasing function, while the Riemann integral specifically uses \(\alpha(x) = x\).
  • Another participant questions whether \(\alpha\) must be continuous from the right, suggesting a potential requirement for the integral's properties.
  • A different viewpoint argues that \(\alpha\) does not need to be increasing or continuous from the right, stating that the Riemann-Stieltjes sum is valid when both \(f\) and \(\alpha\) are bounded, though the existence of the integral may depend on additional conditions.
  • One participant clarifies the correct spelling of Stieltjes' name, noting that many refer to him as "Stieljes" and suggesting that searching for "Stieltjes" yields more relevant results.
  • A participant provides a link to a biography of Stieltjes, mentioning his work on continued fractions and the two-moment problem as part of his contributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the historical and mathematical aspects of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral. There is no consensus on the requirements for the function \(\alpha\) or the historical contributions of Stieltjes and Riemann, indicating multiple competing views and unresolved questions.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various theorems regarding the existence of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral, but these theorems are not fully detailed, leaving some assumptions and conditions unspecified.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I'm curious about the history of the integral.

I believe it was Leibniz who introduced the symbol [itex]\int[/itex]. But what did that meant for him besides anti-derivative (if anything)? For I am told it is Riemann who in a paper, introduced the know definition of the Riemann-Stieljes' integral in terms of partitions, upper and lower integral, and probably also the Riemann sum caracterisation. Some questions: who's Stieljes?Why is his name linked to that of Riemman? Who discovered the fundamental theorem?

So as you can see I'm very confused about all this. Please, tell me what's what? thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know about the history but the "Riemann-Stieljes" integral is different from the "Riemann" integral. The Riemann integral, the thing you learn in basic calculus, is derived using the Riemann sums with [itex]\Delta x[/itex] the length of the interval xi to xi+1: [itex]\Delta x= x_{i+1}- x_i[/itex]. The Riemann-Stieljes integral uses [itex]\Delta x= \alpha(x_{i+1})- \alpha(x_i)[/itex] where [itex]\alpha[/itex] can be any increasing function. In particular, if [itex]\alpha[/itex] is a step function the Riemann-Stieljes integral is a sum.
 
the stieljes integral is the one where alpha(x) is any increasing function; the riemann integral is the special case where alpha(x)=x.
 
Doesn't alpha have to be continuous from the right?
 
alpha doesn't have to be increasing or continuous from the right. The riemann-stieltjes sum makes sense when f and alpha are bounded. The integral may or may not exist though, there are various theorems on existence that I can't usually remember, like f continuous and alpha of bounded variation will do it, but this isn't required.

I'm useless as far as the history goes though, sorry.
 
I hear many people calling Thomas Johannes Stieltjes Stieljes, but his real name was Stieltjes.
It may help when you seach for info on him. Many use Stieljes and I don't know why or how, I don't think they're different persons. Looking for Stieltjes will return much more results.
 
Here's a biography of Stieltjes:
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Stieltjes.html

He introduced the Riemann-Stieltjes integral in a work on continued fractions, dealing in particular with the 2moment problem".
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K