Who Will Win the Super Bowl: Colts or Bears?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wellsi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the Indianapolis Colts versus Chicago Bears game, with participants expressing their support for their respective teams. Initial excitement turns to disappointment as the Colts fall behind early, but they later score a touchdown, bringing the game to a close score of 29-17 in favor of the Colts. Participants share their thoughts on the halftime show featuring Prince, with mixed feelings about its entertainment value. There is a humorous critique of American sports culture, with suggestions that the U.S. should embrace more globally popular sports. The conversation also touches on the commercial breaks during the game, with some expressing frustration over the frequency and content of the ads. Overall, the thread captures a mix of sports enthusiasm, cultural commentary, and lighthearted banter among fans.
  • #31
deerhake.11 said:
did i miss when the foo fighters broke up/died??
why do we have to have prince singing a foo fighters song when I am sure THEY were available... lol

I don't know, but I wish the Foo Fighters and the group UFO would change their names.

i.e. They trash up my google hits.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
just reading all your comments here guys.. how many of you actually watched the game for the GAME.. rather than ads or the half time entertainment of Prince (oh god help us all) haha :)

well done to the Colts thou... way to go GO COLTS
 
  • #33
Apparently it was God's doing:

"The Lord set this up in a way that no one would believe it," said Dungy, according to the Baptist Press. "The Lord tested us a lot this year, but He set this up to get all the glory."

:bugeye: :bugeye: :bugeye: :bugeye: :bugeye:
 
  • #34
you mean the result was the work of god?
 
  • #35
Wellsi said:
you mean the result was the work of god?
Not my words.

Perhaps he possessed that Manning guy :biggrin:

e2a: &http://mirror.colts.com/sub.cfm?page=article7&news_id=4635" :eek: did anyone tell the rest of the world? :-p
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
haha well he WAS that good in the game so its possible :D

i still reckon they won it fair and square. No gods necessary. no princes necessary ;). Did you watch the game? I am in australia here so was following the score... it takes too long to play a game guys...!
 
  • #37
Wellsi said:
it takes too long to play a game guys...!

That's because they need to keep stopping for the commercial breaks. If you think that was long, you should watch baseball sometime. It's even more painfully slow than football. Even when the game is going, there's only about 2 people moving...the guy running the bases and the guy the ball is coming toward. Otherwise, you spend a lot of time watching a bunch of guys standing around scratching themselves.
 
  • #38
oh god... that sounds so bad... i never liked baseball. I am more a NHL or soccer/ football person.. at least they are quick!
 
  • #39
Moonbear said:
That's because they need to keep stopping for the commercial breaks.
The NFL should do like NASCAR and just plaster sponsor decals all over the players and field. :smile:
 
  • #40
J77 said:
"The Lord set this up in a way that no one would believe it," said Dungy, according to the Baptist Press. "The Lord tested us a lot this year, but He set this up to get all the glory."

:bugeye: :bugeye: :bugeye: :bugeye: :bugeye:
How self-centered.

When that guy ran it all the way down the field in the first five seconds that was amazing though.
 
  • #41
Astronuc said:
The NFL should do like NASCAR and just plaster sponsor decals all over the players and field. :smile:

It works for soccer.

I spent most of the game wondering how the Bears were still in striking distance of the Colts. Those two plays that took the Bears from 2nd and 1 to 4th and 23 were pretty special.:smile:

I also kept waiting for the amateur commercials to air. I didn't find out which were made or written by amateurs until this morning. You couldn't tell. They were the driver/pedestrian flirting with each other as they ate Doritos and the Chippendale car washers.

The Doritos commercial was okay and fit well with their commercial with the checkout clerk - both commercials associated the snack with positive emotions ('spicy' personal relationships).

Worst commercial was the Fed-Ex Moon office. Second worst was the Snickers commercial with the mechanics. Third worst was the GM robot that dreams of losing his job and commiting suicide - maybe it struck a chord with autoworkers.
 
  • #42
haha ok I am an aussie and i don't understand you guys and ads! far out they are so annoying! and you guys get so much of them..! So many people talk about the superbowl ads but y?
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
483
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K