Why ##a^0=1##?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike_bb
  • Start date Start date
Mike_bb
Messages
209
Reaction score
20
Hello!

I have problem in understanding why ##a^0=1##.

I represent ##a^x## as ##1*a*a*a*a*...*a## (x times)

Why ##a^0=1##? Why is ##a^0## not equal to ##0##?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's consistent with ##a^{n+1}=a\cdot a^n##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mike_bb
Or, more generally, ##a^{n+m}=a^na^m## implies ##a^0=1##, because otherwise ##a^{n+0}\neq a^n##.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein, jack action and Mike_bb
Mike_bb said:
Hello!

I have problem in understanding why ##a^0=1##.

I represent ##a^x## as ##1*a*a*a*a*...*a## (x times)

Why ##a^0=1##? Why is ##a^0## not equal to ##0##?

Thanks.
Well if your ##x## is zero, then you will have no ##a##'s, so just the ##1## in the begining.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and Mike_bb
Another way to look at it

##a^0 = 1##

##a * a^0 = a * 1##

##a^1 = a##

Of course you can reverse the steps and conclude that ##a^0 = 1##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mike_bb
##a^0=a^1a^{-1}=a\frac{1}{a}=1##
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mike_bb and jack action
Exponents are about multiplication, and 1 is the multiplicative identity.

If exponents represented repeated addition the zeroeth power would be 0, the additive identity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mike_bb
Very similar to post #6.
$$ a^0=a^{x-x}=\frac{a^x}{a^x}=1 $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mike_bb
This has several excellent answers and I cannot improve on them. I just have this persistent nagging voice wanting to express this abstractly, if perhaps not actually usefully for a beginner.
Namely, all answers point out, one way or another, that exponentiation is a function that changes addition into multiplication. (It also has positivity and continuity hypotheses.)

I.e. a>0, then f(x) = a^x, is the only homomorphism from (Q,+) to (R>0,*). I.e. the only function from rationals to positive reals, such that, for all real x,y, f(x+y) = f(x)*f(y).
As a consequence, f carries the additive identity, namely 0, to the multiplicative identity, namely 1.

If you want such a uniqueness statement also for the exponentiation function defined on all reals, i.e. for the function f(x) = a^x, from (R,+) to (R>0,*), you need a continuity hypothesis on f, but this is unnecessary for the desired statement about 0 and 1.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and Mike_bb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K