Why addition? Integral problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jbreezy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Integral
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the integration of two functions and the evaluation of definite integrals from different bounds. The user questions why the integrals are added instead of subtracted, particularly in the context of areas under curves. It is clarified that the area element formula changes at zero, necessitating separate evaluations from -5 to 0 and from 0 to 4. Additionally, there is a mention of a related problem involving rotation about different axes, highlighting a difference in notation that causes confusion. Understanding these concepts is essential for correctly solving the integral problem presented.
Jbreezy
Messages
582
Reaction score
0
Hello, I can't seem to paste this in. So here is the link.
http://www.calcchat.com/book/Calculus-ETF-5e/
It is chapter 7, section 1, question 17.
Why are you adding ∫ [(x+2) +√4 -x] dx + ∫ 2(√4 -x) dx
?
I'm confused for 2 reasons. Why can you not just evaluate from -5 to 4? ( you will see the bounds I don't know how to put them on my integral here)
Why must you evaluate from -5 to 0 then from 0 to 4?
I understand the last term ∫ 2(√4 -x) dx this is 2 times because half is below the x axis.
But the first part...∫ [(x+2) +√4 -x] dx
Why would you add them. I can't seem to visualize why this would be. It seems I would find the area under x+2 then subtract that from the area under √4 -x.
Why not ??
Thanks,
J
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jbreezy said:
Hello, I can't seem to paste this in. So here is the link.
http://www.calcchat.com/book/Calculus-ETF-5e/
It is chapter 7, section 1, question 17.
Why are you adding ∫ [(x+2) +√4 -x] dx + ∫ 2(√4 -x) dx
?
They are really subtracting something. What is the equation of the lower half of that parabola?
Jbreezy said:
I'm confused for 2 reasons. Why can you not just evaluate from -5 to 4? ( you will see the bounds I don't know how to put them on my integral here)
Because the formula for the typical area element changes at 0. Between -5 and 0, the typical area element is (yupper - ylower)Δx. After that, yupper is not a value on that line.
Jbreezy said:
Why must you evaluate from -5 to 0 then from 0 to 4?
I understand the last term ∫ 2(√4 -x) dx this is 2 times because half is below the x axis.
But the first part...∫ [(x+2) +√4 -x] dx
Why would you add them. I can't seem to visualize why this would be. It seems I would find the area under x+2 then subtract that from the area under √4 -x.
Why not ??
Thanks,
J
 
They are really subtracting something. What is the equation of the lower half of that parabola?
Yeah Yeah I see. It is a negative.-

thx
 
Similar question. http://www.calcchat.com/book/Calculus-ETF-5e/
part b they want you to rotate it about the y-axis and in part c about the line x = 3.
I don't understand this difference in writing for part b... 3^2 - (y^2)^2

And in part c they write (3-y)^2 I don't get it.
It is chapter 7 section 2 question 11.
Thanks
 
Seeing that you also started a new thread for this new problem (which is the right thing to do), I am closing this thread.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K