Why Aircraft with Jet Engines Form Cloud Trails

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wavingerwin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cloud Engines Jet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of aircraft, particularly those with jet engines, leaving behind white cloud trails at high altitudes. Participants explore the conditions under which these trails, known as contrails, form and the mechanisms involved in their visibility.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that jet engines emit water vapor as part of their exhaust, which can form visible trails under the right atmospheric conditions.
  • Others note that contrail formation requires specific conditions, such as air saturation with water vapor and temperatures below the dew point, to become visible clouds.
  • A participant draws an analogy between contrail formation and fog, suggesting that predicting when contrails will appear is similarly uncertain.
  • There is a discussion about the role of jet exhaust and atmospheric water in contrail formation, with some arguing that the visible contrail is primarily from atmospheric water, while others suggest that exhaust water serves as nucleation sites.
  • Some participants mention the influence of pressure differences around airfoils and wingtip vortices in the formation of visible trails, though there is contention regarding the common mechanisms of contrail creation.
  • One participant shares personal observations of vapor trails forming near the wings of commercial aircraft, attributing this to changes in air pressure and temperature.
  • Another participant highlights that high-performance aircraft can produce condensation clouds during maneuvers due to significant pressure drops.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms of contrail formation, with some agreeing on the basic principles while others contest specific details. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nuances of these mechanisms and the conditions necessary for contrail visibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various atmospheric conditions and phenomena that influence contrail formation, but there are limitations in the discussion regarding the precise definitions and assumptions underlying these claims.

  • #31
Borek said:
I always thought that it is not water in exhaust gases that provides nucleation sites, but soot from the not burnt fuel.

If you have ever seen plane fyling diretly in your direction (or directly from you) you have probably seen that exhaust gases are brown - that's a soot I am talking about. It is not visible when the exhaust is seen from the side, that's practical application of Lambert-Beer law :smile:

http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/science.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
philippine_sea_planesinsky_800.jpg


AAF-II-p344d.jpg
 
  • #33
That's a neat picture, but was it worth the thread necromancy?
 
  • #34
Yes, it was worth it.

Thanks for contributing to the necromancy yourself.
 
  • #35
necropostage.

necromancy is strictly against forum rules and violators will be cursed.
 
  • #36
It is worth pointing out that jet plane exhaust is mostly water...

I beg to disagree a jet engine exhaust is mostly nitrogen.
 
  • #37
For its length, this is an astonishingly confusing post.


Jobrag said:
It is worth pointing out that jet plane exhaust is mostly water...
I beg to disagree a jet engine exhaust is mostly nitrogen.

At face value, you are pointing out that jet plane exhaust is mostly water and, at the same time, disagreeing that it is mostly nitrogen.



1]
Jobrag said:
It is worth pointing out that jet plane exhaust is mostly water...
I think this is not meant to be your words; I think it is a quote of https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2310855&postcount=14".
Took about ten minutes of my life to figure that out. Please use the quote feature.

2]
Jobrag said:
I beg to disagree a jet engine exhaust is mostly nitrogen.
You are disagreeing that a jet exhaust is mostly nitrogen. Since no one ever mentioned nitrogen, it makes no sense for you to disagree with something never said.

So I'm going to guess this is a punctuation thing. I think what you meant to say was:

I beg to disagree; a jet engine exhaust is mostly nitrogen.

That took another ten minutes of my life to figure out. Please use proper punctuation.


OK, that's all sorted out. Now...


What makes you think it's comprised of nitrogen? Back up your claim.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
Nitrogen in, nitrogen out. The atmosphere is 80% nitrogen. It's a necronitpick.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
30K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K