Why always like poles repel and unlike poles attract

  • Thread starter Thread starter ravivarma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poles Repel
Click For Summary
Like poles repel while unlike poles attract due to the fundamental nature of electromagnetic forces. The interaction of electric and magnetic fields leads to energy changes when fields overlap, with the total energy being higher when like poles are together. This increase in energy when like poles are combined results in a repulsive force. Conversely, unlike poles cancel each other's fields, reducing energy and creating an attractive force. Overall, systems tend to move towards configurations that minimize energy, aligning with the principles of thermal equilibrium.
ravivarma
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anybody say me why always like poles repel and unlike poles attract but not why like poles attract and unlike poles attract
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm tempted to say "that's just the way it is". In order to give a reason for this, we need to somehow model electromagnetism on something more fundamental, and then derive the equations. But, electromagnetism is treated as a fundamental force, so the laws are just that way.

The electric and magnetic fields of two particles overlap and add together. The energy in the field goes something like
\frac{\mathbf{E}^2 + \mathbf{B}^2}{8\pi}
Since this is quadratic in field amplitude, when you bring two fields together, the energy in the field is more than the sum of the energies apart. But if you cancel out the fields, the energy decreases. Unlike charges will cancel out the fields, so it reduces the energy.

Systems try to go toward thermal equilibrium, which usually means toward minimum energy, since the ambient temperature is pretty small.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K