Music Why are ABBA so popular?

[pinball1970]

How not? I mean, any more or less than Led Zeppelin?

Both refer to the people in them, as well as the structure, people and equipment that surrounds and supports them.

You guys .....

Remember ABBA? Some decent tunes from them.
This one is pure beauty, I could gush about the pre chorus or the lovely middle eight or harmony but I'll leave it at, beautiful. I used to go and visit my gf in York and they had this on the Juke box. It went on every time, all the girls would look at me and say, "ABBA!?" Damn right.

 

[PeroK]

Neither is Led Zeppelin, or ABBA.

That's precisely what they are.

https://www.scribbr.co.uk/nouns/collective-noun/

 

[DaveC426913]

That's precisely what they are.

https://www.scribbr.co.uk/nouns/collective-noun/

I know what a collective noun is. That does not make the bands collective nouns.

As for their example: 'The Beatles broke up when Paul McCartney quit the band.' (which is a collective noun):

The name is explicitly indicating that
- The Beatles contains a definite article - a title as it were, indicating the performers themselves (that's their gimmick), and that
- The Beatles is plural - each performer being 'a Beatle'. Any one of them can say 'I am a Beatle_' (singular).

Contrarily, they are not called The ABBAs or The Led Zeppelins. And a single band member is not called 'an ABBA' or 'a Led Zeppelin'.

We don't say
- 'There are only three of The ABBAs left, after one ABBA passed away.'
- 'There are only three of The Led Zeppelins left, after one Led Zeppelin passed away.'

Apples and oranges.

 

[pinball1970]

The Tiger, listening to them with older ears again I have noticed the are absolute kings of middle eight and pre chorus.

"Yellow eyes are glowing....." Part.

 

[phinds]

Interestingly, my daughter happened to come in and saw the title of this thread. She was horrified. DAD ! She exclaimed loudly ... I can't BELIEVE you would use terrible grammar.

Ha. I taught her well

 

[PeroK]

I know what a collective noun is. That does not make the bands collective nouns.

There is no obligation on the rest of the English-speaking world to obey what one Canadian thinks is the only way to use the language. In British English, the name of a team or band can be used with the singular or plural verb. That's a fact.

You can say we are wrong and we should all speak like Canadians - but we are under no obligation to follow your edict.

 

[pinball1970]

I have been reading all the comments and trying out different contexts since yesterday.
(Since 41% of thread is now about that rather than music)
None of the singular applications sounds right.

A few examples.

I refer to Manchester United as "we," a lot. "Who are we playing tonight?" "Did we win?" "Yes, we beat Fulham."

Why we? I am a supporter.

Otherwise it is "they," "I hope they do better than last season."

It is one club, singular so I could use it but is sounds totally wrong, is this just my vernacular clicking in?
I really don't know.

Same with a band of two or more, "For me Deep Purple live 1972, no one could touch them or ever will."

 

[PeroK]

I refer to Manchester United as "we," a lot. "Who are we playing tonight?" "Did we win?" "Yes, we beat Fulham."

Why we? I am a supporter.

This is where semantics overlaps with grammar. Manchester United is technically a singular noun. In one context it is a single entity. I would definitely say:

Manchester United FC was founded in 1878.

But, semantically, it represents a collection of players (in one context) and a collection of players, staff and supporters (in a wider context). In these contexts, it becomes increasingly contrived to avoid the plural form. For example:

The players who are representing MUFC are playing well tonight!

In this case, it is acceptable in British English to say more simply:

Manchester United are playing well tonight.

This emphasises the semantic point that it is a team of individuals that are all playing well. We can contrast this with:

Manchester United is playing well tonight.

Although this is grammatically correct, it sounds stilted.

PS in North America, this situation is generally avoided by pluralising the team names: NY Giants, Toronto Blue Jays etc.

 

[pinball1970]

I know what a collective noun is. That does not make the bands collective nouns.

As for their example: 'The Beatles broke up when Paul McCartney quit the band.' (which is a collective noun):

The name is explicitly indicating that
- The Beatles contains a definite article - a title as it were, indicating the performers themselves (that's their gimmick), and that
- The Beatles is plural - each performer being 'a Beatle'. Any one of them can say 'I am a Beatle_' (singular).

Contrarily, they are not called The ABBAs or The Led Zeppelins. And a single band member is not called 'an ABBA' or 'a Led Zeppelin'.

We don't say
- 'There are only three of The ABBAs left, after one ABBA passed away.'
- 'There are only three of The Led Zeppelins left, after one Led Zeppelin passed away.'

Apples and oranges.

"The Beatles" is the name of the band.

ABBA, Deep Purple, Led Zeppelin do not have a definite article in the name.

Oranges and apples.

 

[DaveC426913]

In British English, the name of a team or band can be used with the singular or plural verb. That's a fact.

Humour me.

Name one.

...OK ... name another one.

Show an equivalent of an ABBA, or a Led Zeppelin or a The Who.

 

[pinball1970]

Is there anything more English than the BBC?

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140415-why-are-abba-so-popular

 

[PeroK]

Humour me.

Name one.

...OK ... name another one.

Show an equivalent of an ABBA, or a Led Zeppelin or a The Who.

The Who are an English rock band:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Who

 

[DaveC426913]

The Who are an English rock band:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Who

Thanks. I've fixed their errors.

 

[Astronuc]

Yes, but that's hardly ALL they did. If they had written great tunes but been crappy singers do you think that would have become so popular. Some of us just LOVE harmony groups. The Ames Brothers, The Kingston Trio (yes, I'm dating myself with those and a few more ), The Everly Brothers, The Beach Boys, the Chad Mitchel Trio, Peter Paul and Mary, Simon and Garfunkel, Crosby, Stills, and Nash, The Mamas and the Papas, and on and on.

I was thinking of the Eagles, which was a popular group with many hits, as I listened to some Joe Walsh.

Certainly, Crosby, Stills, Nash with or without Neil Young.

Harmony, music and lyrics.

 

[phinds]

I was thinking of the Eagles, which was a popular group with many hits, as I listened to some Joe Walsh.

Yeah, it occurred to me that I had left them out. I loved them.

 

[DaveC426913]

Thanks. I've fixed their errors.

Drat. It didn't stay fixed. Well, Wikipedia and I can agree to disagree.

 

[DennisN]

Is there anything more English than the BBC?

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140415-why-are-abba-so-popular

An interesting article, thanks!
And I did not know about Fridas dramatic life, that was pretty intense.

 

[DennisN]

A live performance from ca 1979/1980... listen particularly to the live vocals from 1:14 - 1:57; the harmonies of the two girls are gorgeous, and then Agneta just ends the section with a superb high pitch, high energy glide/glissando at 1:54 - 1:56... it's incredible .

ABBA - Hole In Your Soul (from ABBA In Concert)

 

[PeroK]

Drat. It didn't stay fixed. Well, Wikipedia and I can agree to disagree.

There ought to be no disagreement, other than British English is not Canadian English. You can write color and I can write colour, but we don't have to slug it out to see who's right.

 

[DaveC426913]

There ought to be no disagreement, other than British English is not Canadian English. You can write color and I can write colour, but we don't have to slug it out to see who's right.

Yeah, I did not realize it was actually a British convention to treat groups as collective nouns.

The wiki edit page has this comment: "are" (and other plural being verbs) is used for British English

 

[pinball1970]

An interesting article, thanks!
And I did not know about Fridas dramatic life, that was pretty intense.

I did not know that much about their backgrounds. Freda terribly sad.
I know they all married then divorced.

 

[pinball1970]

Ha. I taught her well

I thought Americans said, "I learned her good." ;)

 

[pinball1970]

“The key to Abba is their understated Swedishness,” explains Carl Magnus Palm.

That explains everything and nothing!

The rest of the BBC article explains a lot more but I love that quote.

Anyway my claim is ABBA is great for a reason and like the Beatles they were great song writers. Point one.
The other part that other posters have referred to was the ABBA harmony which also gave them the "sound."
They had a great sound because they had two individual great voices that sounded perfect together and very similar to each other.

They could sing the same line together, not easy, the Beatles rarely did because it sounds messy. They preferred double tracking their own voice on a lot of tracks.
Clearly ABBA harmony was amazing, not surprising since they had such a good platform from which to play off, the fantastic tune and chords!
They used lots of tricks and I would like to know if the ladies contributed or was it all Benny and Bjorn?
Agnetha had written hit songs before so I would guess yes.
Ignoring what they look like (imagine radio only stars) that is why the music is so great. (To me)

 

[phinds]

I thought Americans said, "I learned her good." ;)

No, Americans don't but Amuricans do.

 

[DennisN]

This is another favorite ABBA song of mine, "When All Is Said And Done", less famous and less successful than many of their other songs.

Though I have to put in a personal caveat: I don't think the production of it quite does the song justice. It is the third song on their last album "The Visitors" and maybe they weren't as motivated as before to do a top notch production, I don't know. I personally think the production could have been better (drums are ok, but could have been better, same with bass and some synth sounds).

Still, I often listen to songs "beneath" the production, so to say, to get the grasp of the core of the song itself.

And this song is an excellent song, in my opinion:

1. The melodies are marvellous, they go up and down, backwards and forwards.
2. The lead vocals AND the backing vocals are very good. Listen particularly to the backing vocals, they are exquisite!
3. There's a cool, subtle yet effective effect on the lead vocals coming in at 1:56.
4. The lyrics are really well written.

This song is also a great example of the peculiar ABBA quality of being happy and sad in the same song. The mood of the song is somewhere in between; somewhat melancholic but also joyful.
It is essentially a song describing a mature breakup.

ABBA - When All Is Said And Done

 

[DennisN]

The Tiger, listening to them with older ears again I have noticed the are absolute kings of middle eight and pre chorus.

"Yellow eyes are glowing....." Part.

That was one of my favorite songs when I was a teen.
I don't think I've heard it in 30 years, actually.

It's a good song, now when I heard it I particularly noticed the low key parts (with just vocals and piano), they are really, really good. It sounds almost a bit psychedelic in those parts, very cool!

Here's a cool live/semilive (?) version:

ABBA - Tiger - High Quality Audio from ᗅᗺᗷᗅ The Movie 1977 - Australia


Thanks for feeding my ABBA obsession, @pinball1970 !
I've tried to quit listening to them, but I can't.

I find it particularly interesting to listen to them nowadays from an analytical (musical) viewpoint; there is so much to learn from their songs regarding composition and production, in my opinion.

 

[DennisN]

Ok, this is an ABBA thread, but I hope it's ok to post two of my favorite songs from Björn and Bennys musical "Chess"... I haven't heard them in a long time, and when I listened to them again I got goosebumps...
...they are so good:

Chess (Instrumental) (1984)


I Know Him So Well (1984) - from Chess, with Elaine Paige & Barbara Dickson

 

[Hornbein]

The distinctive sound of the Yamaha DX-7. It never really caught on.

 

[DennisN]

The distinctive sound of the Yamaha DX-7

I used to have one myself!
I never liked it, I used it only as a keyboard to control an external sound module.
The Yamaha DX-7 was a pain in the a** to program, let me tell you (and I can write computer programs ).
Later I switched to a Roland JX-8P, which has a much better and warmer sound.
I still have got it, and it works perfectly.

 

[pinball1970]

I used to have one myself!
I never liked it, I used it only as a keyboard to control an external sound module.
The Yamaha DX-7 was a pain in the a** to program, let me tell you (and I can write computer programs ).
Later I switched to a Roland JX-8P, which has a much better and warmer sound.
I still have got it, and it works perfectly.

You would like our vocalist and key board player. They speak in a different language.

Them: The Korg.....( numbers and letters) Was great at (xyz) but not quite as good as the Roland (numbers and letters) but that had (ABC) issue.

The Rhodes obviously best for (.....)

Me: (wakes up) Randy Rhodes? I liked his technique but the shredding....

Everyone else: Sh.