Why Are Moments Calculated Differently for Force Components in Statics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eurekameh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Here is my question:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/31/unledasm.png/
On this figure, there is a 50 N force on the bigger pulley. When summing up the moments about the x-axis, why isn't -50(0.15) [circled on figure] the same as (-50cos45)(0.15) + (-50sin45)(0.15), which is the sum of the moments of its components?
 
eurekameh said:
Here is my question:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/31/unledasm.png/
On this figure, there is a 50 N force on the bigger pulley. When summing up the moments about the x-axis, why isn't -50(0.15) [circled on figure] the same as (-50cos45)(0.15) + (-50sin45)(0.15), which is the sum of the moments of its components?

I have a 22" monitor, but that image is still too small to read anything?
 
eurekameh said:
Here is my question:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/31/unledasm.png/
On this figure, there is a 50 N force on the bigger pulley. When summing up the moments about the x-axis, why isn't -50(0.15) [circled on figure] the same as (-50cos45)(0.15) + (-50sin45)(0.15), which is the sum of the moments of its components?
I was able to see the image. The 50 N force is applied to the pulley tangent to its circumference at a point 45 degrees counterclockwise from its vertical z axis. It is not applied at the top of the pulley. When you break it into its components, the perpendicular distance is not 0.15 m. Either calculate the perpendicular distance, or use the cross product rule, when calculating the sum of moments this way, and you get the same result.
 
PhanthomJay said:
I was able to see the image. The 50 N force is applied to the pulley tangent to its circumference at a point 45 degrees counterclockwise from its vertical z axis. It is not applied at the top of the pulley. When you break it into its components, the perpendicular distance is not 0.15 m. Either calculate the perpendicular distance, or use the cross product rule, when calculating the sum of moments this way, and you get the same result.

This helped me. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K