I Why Are Reflected Rays Often Ignored in Lens Studies?

AI Thread Summary
Reflected rays are often ignored in lens studies primarily because they are typically dim and can create unwanted artifacts like ghost images, making them less relevant for basic analysis. While refracted rays are the main focus, reflections can be significant in advanced optical engineering, where minimizing or managing them is crucial. The ratio of reflected to refracted rays can be described by the Fresnel equations, although detailed analysis is usually not necessary for conventional lenses. Good optical design should account for parasitic reflections and scattered light to prevent interference with the main image. Overall, while reflections are an inherent aspect of lens design, they are often deemed less critical unless specific optical performance is required.
E3Phy
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I am wondering why reflected rays are not considered with lenses? If a Ray strikes a surface another is reflected off that striking point; however, this is not added when studying lenses, only refracted rays are considered.
Is there any law which gives the ratio of reflected and refracted rays with lenses?

Cheers.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The reflection is very dim, so isn't really useful and you usually ignore them. If you get into optical engineering you can certainly consider reflections. You generally want to make sure they're absorbed somewhere in the system because they typically annoy the user by giving ghost images - google "lens flare" for the most common example of these.
 
  • Like
Likes difalcojr and DaveE
E3Phy said:
I am wondering why reflected rays are not considered with lenses?
Maybe because they aren't always pertinent to the person doing the analysis. If there's a reason to consider them, they can be analyzed.

E3Phy said:
Is there any law which gives the ratio of reflected and refracted rays
Yes. Absolutely. Although it can be quite a chore. Normally you would minimize reflection in a conventional lens, or maximize it for mirror lenses (like most modern telescopes). The other rays are, hopefully, insignificant and don't require detailed analysis. However, there are optical systems where it does matter.

This is all based on the basic classical E&M concept of reflection and transmission coefficients.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations
 
  • Like
Likes difalcojr and Ibix
Thank you all for your answers; just wanted to make sure I was not missing anything; I'll study the given links further
 
E3Phy said:
why reflected rays are not considered with lenses?
A good optical design would considered a parasite reflections and a scattered light. Most optical soft are intended for optimizing the main light flow passing the optical system, but there are special modes to study secondary reflections and scattering. However it is more difficult level as demanding to have a good models of the coatings and baffles. Good design should at least consider that the parasite reflection should not focus close to the image plane to avoid host images.
The most difficult is the management of the scattered light which demands exact model of lenses, mechanics, baffles, coatings on optical and mechanical surfaces in combination with a different combination of the objects in the object space.
 
  • Like
Likes difalcojr and DaveE
E3Phy said:
Thank you all for your answers; just wanted to make sure I was not missing anything; I'll study the given links further
Those reflections are always there and they're the bane of the designer's life. The reflections are from the surfaces (and there may be six in a three element , high quality lens. The surfaces of the lens elements are not just spherical and the secondary images occur all over the place.
 

Attachments

  • 1708444906258.png
    1708444906258.png
    29.3 KB · Views: 62
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top