Why are the angles in rope equilibrium the same?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a rope and a pulley system situated between two parallel walls. The scenario describes a pulley with mass sliding to an equilibrium position, raising questions about the angles formed by the rope with the walls and the nature of tension in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the angles of the rope and the equilibrium state of the pulley. Questions arise regarding the nature of tension on either side of the pulley and the implications of assuming different angles.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about the pulley and the angles involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of an ideal pulley and the implications for tension and equilibrium, though there is still some uncertainty expressed about the reasoning behind the angles being equal.

Contextual Notes

The problem is constrained by the assumption of an ideal pulley, which is massless and frictionless, and lacks additional information that might clarify the scenario further.

bolzano95
Messages
89
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Between two parallel walls we tighten a rope. One end of a rope is tied a little higher on the wall than the end on the opposite wall. On the rope we put a pulley with mass m which slides to equilibrium position.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that in equilibrium the angles with which the ends of the rope are connected with the wall are different. But in the solution states that in the equilibrium the inclined angles are the same.
Interesting.
How can this be explained?
I know that forces in x direction cancel each other out, but I wouldn't conclude that the forces in the rope are also the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the tension on one side of the pulley different from the other side? Presumably this is an ideal pulley.
 
Yes, the pulley here is presumed ideal. The problem doesn't give anything except what is written above under problem statement.
 
bolzano95 said:
Yes, the pulley here is presumed ideal. The problem doesn't give anything except what is written above under problem statement.
You don't need more to answer the question. What is the most important property of an ideal pulley other than it is assumed massless and there is no friction at the bearings?
 
Ok, so in this case I disregard the mass of the pulley and the friction but what I still don't get is why in the equilibrium the inclined angles are the same.
 
Because the most important property of an ideal pulley is that it changes the direction of the tension without changing its magnitude. Write down the horizontal components of the tension on each side of the pulley and see what must be necessary in order to have equilibrium.
 
Lets suppose the angles and therefore forces are different. I would write horizontal components for equilibrium as:
F_{1}cos\alpha= F_{2}cos\beta

and for vertical:
F_{g}= F_{1}sin\alpha + F_{2}sin\beta

I still don't get it, sorry.
 
bolzano95 said:
Lets suppose the angles and therefore forces are different. I would write horizontal components for equilibrium as:
You cannot suppose that the forces are different. This is an ideal pulley that has the property that I explained in post #6. What happens to ##F_1 \cos\alpha=F_2 \cos\beta## when ##F_1=F_2## as is the case here?
 
You are right. Then the angles are the same.
 
  • #10
Here is another way to look at it. The magnitudes of the tensions on either side are always equal. As long as the angles are different, the pulley will accelerate because the horizontal tension components are unbalanced. Once the angles become equal, the horizontal components are balanced, the pulley stops accelerating and is in equilibrium.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
994
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K