Why are the d and f orbitals in transition metals considered localized?

  • I
  • Thread starter Rzbs
  • Start date
  • #1
Rzbs
52
11
TL;DR Summary
Why are d and f orbitals localized?
Why d and f orbitals in transition metals considered localize?
Is it an experimetal result that d and f orbitals are more near to nuclea than s orbital in transition metals or there is another reason for considering them localized in a solid?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,258
906
d and f orbitals are orbital in inner shells (n-1 and n-2, respectively), hence they are more localized in the inner of the atoms. The precise size depends also on the filling of the sub-shells. electrons in d- and f- orbitals hardly shield each other from the nuclear charge. Hence, as the filling of the sub-shell increases, the electrons see an increasingly higher effective nuclear charge, which leads to a shrinking of the obitals. Therefore, e.g. the noble metals have relatively low oxidation states and are little reactive in comparison to the earlier elements in the d-block.
 
  • #3
Rzbs
52
11
Thanks
 

Suggested for: Why are the d and f orbitals in transition metals considered localized?

Replies
4
Views
263
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
559
Replies
5
Views
506
Replies
5
Views
931
Replies
1
Views
791
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
682
Replies
7
Views
737
Replies
7
Views
718
Replies
7
Views
811
Top