Why are the electrons heavier in silicon?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mindstream
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Silicon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effective masses of electrons and holes in silicon, specifically addressing why electrons appear to have a greater effective mass compared to holes. Participants explore the implications of dispersion curves and band structure on effective mass calculations, with a focus on the differences between longitudinal and transverse effective masses.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that effective masses can be determined from the curvature of the dispersion curve, suggesting that less curved extrema indicate heavier effective masses.
  • Another participant clarifies that the effective mass of silicon electrons is an ellipsoid, and the values quoted are longitudinal and transverse masses, which can differ significantly.
  • A different participant points out that the effective mass values for holes are often misinterpreted, and there is no inherent reason for hole masses to be lighter than electron masses.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the effective mass values and their implications, referencing Wikipedia for comparison with germanium.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of band structure calculations in determining effective mass, distinguishing between effective mass and density of states effective mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of effective masses and the significance of band structure. There is no consensus on why electrons in silicon are heavier than holes, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the anisotropic nature of effective masses and the complexity of band structure calculations, indicating that these factors may influence the interpretation of effective mass values.

mindstream
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey there.

I have a question concerning the effective masses in silicon. From what I've learned, the effective masses of electrons and holes can be determined from the curvature of the dispersion curve at the extrema. Since the effective mass is inversely proportional to the second derivative of energy, the less curved extrema represent the heavier electrons or holes. The effective mass tables give values of 0,92 (m*/m0) and 0,19 (m*/m0) for the electrons and 0,52 (m*/m0) and 0,16 (m*/m0) for the holes in silicon. Basically, the electron is almost twice as heavy as the heaviest hole. Now the problem I'm facing is that the dispersion curves aren't that diverse from my point of view.
So is there a flaw in my way of thinking and why are the electrons heavier in silicon.

Thanks in regard.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The effective mass of silicon electrons is an ellipsoid, you are quoting the longitudinal and transverse masses. They are highly ellipsoidal, so the masses will be quite different.

As for the others, you are quoting the valence bands (heavy hole and light hole), not too much anisotropy there given the approximation. In more exact formulations the band edge effective masses for the holes is much more anisotropic.

There is no reason that the hole masses have to be heavier than the electrons, and I cannot think of any semiconductor where the electron is heavier than the either of the holes. A really good reason escapes me at the present, so I'll have to look at some of my references to better explain it.
 
My mistake about the transverse/longitudinal masses. I guess I was referring to the density of states effective mass (or whatever the mass that can be determined from the dispersion curves is called).

But according to Wikipedia:

Material Electron effective mass Hole effective mass

Si 1.08 me 0.56 me
Ge 0.55 me 0.37 me

And I still don't see that big of a difference in silicon. It's more distinct in germanium though.

So, I'm guessing there's something wrong with my comprehension of this matter.
 
It's all in the band structure and how it is calculated. Now one thing that needs to be said, what you quoted above is the effective mass, not the density of states effective mass which is different. The density of states effective mass takes into account the band structure in a more general manner and is not constant with respect to direction in the crystal, I worked it out in my dissertation for anisotropic materials and the originator was my advisor, the link is, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 3612 (1983) .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K