Why are there not up and down quantum numbers?

Click For Summary
The absence of up and down quantum numbers is linked to the flavor symmetry of quarks, particularly under SU(N_f), which is broken by quark masses. The neutral pion (u\bar{u} or d\bar{d}) is its own antiparticle due to the indistinguishability of its components, while the neutral kaon (d\bar{s}) and its antiparticle (\bar{d}s) are different, preventing it from being its own antiparticle. However, the neutral kaon can exist in a superposition state that allows it to behave as its own antiparticle under certain conditions. The distinction between upness and downness is often referred to as isospin, with electric charge already differentiating the up and down quarks. The mixing of neutral kaons through weak interactions leads to different eigenstates with varying lifetimes, complicating their behavior in particle physics.
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hi. I am a bit confused by the fact that there are quantum numbers related to every flavour of quark except the up and down. A consequence of this is that the neutral pion is it's own anti-particle while the neutral kaon is not. Why is this so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A neutral pion is either u \bar{u} or d \bar{d}. In either case, the antiparticle gives the identical thing (remember, order isn't important!).

A neutral kaon, on the other hand, is d \bar{s}, whose antiparticle is \bar{d} s, clearly not the same thing.

A caveat is that you can have the kaon as a superposition, like \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( d \bar{s} \pm \bar{d} s \right), in which case it IS its own antiparticle.
 
Last edited:
You can assign either upness or downness as a quantum number. These flavor quantum numbers can be viewed as the remnants of an SU(N_f) flavor symmetry that would be present in the absence of quark masses. Maximally breaking this symmetry via quark masses leaves the U(1)^{N_f-1} symmetry associated to the flavors. Typically we choose the up quark to be neutral, with each other quark having charge one under a separate factor.

Edit: I should add that downness isn't such an interesting quantum number since the electric charge already distinguishes between the up and down quark (so no analogy of the neutral kaon as already pointed out.)
 
Last edited:
Nabeshin said:
A neutral pion is either u \bar{u} or b \bar{b}...
I assume the latter is a typo, and what you meant was d \bar{d}.
 
AdrianTheRock said:
I assume the latter is a typo, and what you meant was d \bar{d}.

ty :)
 
the reason is simple; you don't call it up-ness or down-ness but isospin
 
Nabeshin said:
A caveat is that you can have the kaon as a superposition, like \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( d \bar{s} \pm \bar{d} s \right), in which case it IS its own antiparticle.
You cannot have such superposition and the neutral Kaon can never be its own antiparticle! Because strong interaction conserves strangeness while the weak interaction does not, the neutral Kaon eigenstates with respect to these interactions are very different from each other; the strong-interaction eigenstates K_{0} \sim d \bar{s} and \bar{K}_{0} \sim s \bar{d} can MIX through weak transitions such as the one with two pions as intermediate state. In this K_{0}- \bar{K}_{0} mixing, the \bar{K}_{0} is the CP conjugate of K_{0},
|\bar{K}_{0}\rangle = CP|K_{0}\rangle .
The mixing can be described by “effective Hamiltonian” having two eigenstates with very different lifetimes,
K_{S} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2(1 + |\epsilon |^{2})}}\{ (K_{0} + \bar{K}_{0}) + \epsilon (K_{0} - \bar{K}_{0}) \}
K_{L} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2(1 + |\epsilon |^{2})}}\{ (K_{0} - \bar{K}_{0}) + \epsilon (K_{0} + \bar{K}_{0}) \}.

Sam
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K