Why body A has greater acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
Body A has greater acceleration due to the dynamics of the system involving a 1 kg mass connected to body B. The discussion highlights that while both bodies have the same mass, the forces acting on them differ because of the tension in the string and the gravitational force on the 1 kg mass. It is emphasized that understanding the net forces through free body diagrams is crucial for solving such problems. Participants note that even experienced individuals can overlook fundamental concepts after a break from studying physics. Drawing free body diagrams can clarify the forces at play and help prevent confusion in similar scenarios.
Iamconfused123
Messages
66
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
question is which body A has greater acceleration?
Relevant Equations
F=ma
Apparently body A has greater acceleration and I don't get why. Can someone please explain.

It's stated to take g=10/s^2.
Both bodies have same mass.
Nothing about rope elasticity is added, and nothing about the pulley. So I assumed they are both massless, and no friction between them.
Also, the table surface is frictionless.
Thank you
pf.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pulley and string may be massless, but the 1 kg mass is definitely not massless!
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
yeah but, 1kg×10m/s^2=10N so both forces are the same, masses the same, thus accelerations are the same
 
Iamconfused123 said:
yeah but, 1kg×10m/s^2=10N so both forces are the same, masses the same, thus accelerations are the same
No, they are not. If the tension in the string were 10 N then the net force on the 1 kg mass would be zero and it would not accelerate.
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
Iamconfused123 said:
yeah but, 1kg×10m/s^2=10N so both forces are the same, masses the same, thus accelerations are the same
Yeah but, the 1 kg mass is not massless.
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
Orodruin said:
No, they are not. If the tension in the string were 10 N then the net force on the 1 kg mass would be zero and it would not accelerate.
But the bodies(A and B) are not connected, if that is what you are saying.
 
Iamconfused123 said:
But the bodies(A and B) are not connected, if that is what you are saying.
The 1kg mass is connected to B.
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
PeroK said:
The 1kg mass is connected to B.
Okay, but why does that matter? 1kg is falling with 10N pulling B with 10 N, same force as the hand is pulling A
 
Iamconfused123 said:
Okay, but why does that matter?
It;s fundamental.
Iamconfused123 said:
1kg is falling with 10N
What does that mean?
Iamconfused123 said:
pulling B with 10 N, same force as the hand is pulling A
Is it? What about Newton's third law? If the 1 kg mass pulls B with a force of 10N, then B pulls the 1kg mass with an opposite force of 10N, and the 1kg won't move, as it has a zero net force acting on it.
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
  • #10
May I suggest drawing free body diagrams of each mass ( A,B, and 1kg) for us to examine together?
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
  • #11
ohh. I figured. How stupid am I :headbang::headbang::headbang::headbang::headbang:
 
  • #12
Thanks everyone. :bow:
 
  • #13
erobz said:
May I suggest drawing free body diagrams of each mass ( A,B, and 1kg) for us to examine together?
Like, I never draw those. And the best thing is that I have solved whole bunch of problems with like these, but they were like, calculate acceleration. I did take a brake from physics for 2 weeks or so, but still, like I knew how to do these problems. Is it normal for people to forget that fast?
 
  • #14
Iamconfused123 said:
ohh. I figured. How stupid am I :headbang::headbang::headbang::headbang::headbang:
It's not that big a deal. It's tricky like that on purpose. Thats why its important to draw a FBD, because it becomes apparent when to "see" the forces.
 
  • Like
Likes Iamconfused123
Back
Top