Why can a velocity of a wave be negative?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why wave velocities can be negative or positive. Negative velocities indicate movement in the opposite direction of displacement, while positive velocities represent movement in the intended direction. The equations referenced primarily describe simple harmonic motion rather than true wave propagation. For actual waves, the velocity is typically described using the cosine function, which illustrates directionality in propagation. Overall, wave directionality is key to understanding velocity signs, especially in contexts like sound or string vibrations.
andorrak
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi yall,

Im trying to understand waves and I am wondering why the velocities are negative sometimes and or positive.

I think that the velocities are negative because of the slope of the wave as it is coming down? I just want to completely understand it and am a little confused.

Like the equations i use are x(t)-Acos(wt+(phi)) or v(t)=-Awcos(wt+(phi))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Strictly speaking, I wouldn't call those waves. They're just sines and cosines (by the way your velocity is not correct, it should not have the negative sign and should be sin(wt + phi) instead. The derivative you calculated is simply the slope.

When people talk about the velocity of a wave, they're typically talking about something propagating as cos(kx - wt) where k is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_number" . The former being the velocity of the wave you're probably thinking about, the latter being something when you talk about frequencies that are not constant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the positive and negative velocity means different directions
 
yea that was a mistype.

But why can't the velocities always be positive? I seem to feel like the wave is always moving in one direction unless it's reflected back at me.
 
the two equations you offer are for simple harmonic motion,not waves.so if the velocity is negative,it means the direction of it is opposite from displacement(or x in your first equation)
 
andorrak said:
yea that was a mistype.

But why can't the velocities always be positive? I seem to feel like the wave is always moving in one direction unless it's reflected back at me.

You have to specify what you're talking about. Like azureth is saying, what you have could tell you about the velocity of a simple harmonic oscillator such as a spring. The positive/negative tells you about whether or not it's traveling to the left or right.

When you're talking about say, waves in the air or a vibration you make on a string that actually propagates, your propagation has to be something like cos(kx - wt). If you plotted this function for various times of 't', you'd find a wave that propagates in the positive-x direction.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
847
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K