Why can i not use induction here?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter linuxux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies why mathematical induction cannot be applied to the statement \((\bigcup^{\infty}_{n=1}A_{n})^{c} = \bigcap^{\infty}_{n=1}A_{n}^{c}\). Induction is valid for proving statements involving positive integers, such as \((\bigcup^{N}_{n=1}A_{n})^{c} = \bigcap^{N}_{n=1}A_{n}^{c}\) for any positive integer \(N\). The key distinction is that infinity is not a positive integer, thus preventing the use of induction for infinite cases. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the limitations of induction in the context of infinite sets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction principles
  • Familiarity with set theory concepts, particularly unions and intersections
  • Knowledge of complements of sets
  • Basic grasp of infinite sets and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Explore set theory, focusing on unions, intersections, and complements
  • Learn about the differences between finite and infinite sets
  • Investigate alternative proof techniques for statements involving infinity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematics, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of induction and set theory, particularly in the context of infinite sets.

linuxux
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
I'm presented with this,

(1)\ (\bigcup^{\infty}_{\n=1}A_{n})^{c}\ =\ \bigcap^{\infty}_{\n=1}A_{n}^{c}

and asked why induction cannot be used to conclude this.

Now, i know the principle behind induction is to show that P(S)=N by showing that when

(i) S contains 1 and
(ii) whenever S contains a natural number n, it also contains n+1.

So I assume somewhere along the line (1) can't fit into either (i) or (ii), but I'm just not getting it. Help please, thanks.

I also have some trouble understanding infinity in general. My text says that, notationally,

(2)\ \bigcup^{\infty}_{\n=1}A_{n}

is just another way of saying the set whose elements consist of any element that appears in at least one particular (An), but, in a previous question, we already proved with induction that

(3)\ (A_1\ \cup\ A_2\ \cup\ A_3\ \cup\ ...\ \cup\ A_n)^c\ =\ A^{c}_{1}\ \cup\ A^{c}_{2}\ \cup\ A^{c}_{3}\ \cup\ ...\ \cup\ A^{c}_{n}

In my mind, (3) should lead to (1), and since we used induction on (3) to extrapolate to (1), then we did use induction to prove (1), but obviously, this is incorrect and I am not sure why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a sequence of sets, A_n. If an element x in not in the union of this collection of sets then it is not inside ANY set in this sequence of sets. (*)That means it is in the compliment of every set contained in the sequence of sets ie the intersection(*). We have shown the LHS is contained in the RHS of (1), now show the other containment using contraposition.

You can use induction to prove in detail the sentence surrounded with asterisks given the information of the previous sentence. A similar proof is used for the converse.
 
The principle of induction can be used to prove that a statement S(n) is true for n any positive integer. It CANNOT be used to prove that a statement is true for infinity.

Induction can be used to prove
(1)\ (\bigcup^{N}_{n=1}A_{n})^{c}\ =\ \bigcap^{N}_{n=1}A_{n}^{c}
for any positive integer N.

It cannot be used to prove
(1)\ (\bigcup^{\infty}_{\n=1}A_{n})^{c}\ =\ \bigcap^{\infty}_{\n=1}A_{n}^{c}
because "\infty" is NOT a positive integer.
 
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K