Why can k in the Delta Function equation be both positive and negative?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of the constant k in the context of the Dirac delta function, specifically why k can take on both positive and negative values in the equation involving the delta function. Participants explore the implications of k being positive or negative and how it affects the integral involving the delta function.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether k is a fixed constant that can only be positive or negative, suggesting a need for clarification on its role in the equation.
  • One participant notes that the domain of the function is kx and discusses the necessity of including a plus-minus sign before the integral when k ranges from negative to positive infinity.
  • Another participant explains that the formula attempts to prove the equation δ(k x) = (1/|k|) δ(k x), emphasizing that k must be non-zero for the equation to make sense.
  • It is mentioned that for k > 0, the integral involving the delta function yields a specific outcome, while for k < 0, the outcome is expressed differently, leading to a discussion on the generalization for arbitrary functions with single-order zeros.
  • One post introduces a broader context involving Fourier transforms and the relationship between the delta function and distributions, referencing historical contributions from Cauchy and Dirac.
  • A later post presents a mathematical expression related to binomial expansions, though its relevance to the delta function discussion is unclear.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of k, with some expressing confusion about its fixedness and others providing technical explanations that suggest a more nuanced understanding. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of k being positive or negative.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of notation and the assumptions made about k, particularly regarding its values and the conditions under which the delta function operates. The discussion also touches on the need for specific mathematical steps to be clarified.

mathnerd15
Messages
109
Reaction score
0
in this equation why does k take on both positive and negative values? isn't k a fixed constant that can only be positive or negative
 

Attachments

  • Dirac.gif
    Dirac.gif
    5.2 KB · Views: 492
Physics news on Phys.org
mathnerd15 said:
in this equation why does k take on both positive and negative values? isn't k a fixed constant that can only be positive or negative

ques. not visible
 
oh you have to click on the attachment and then the picture to see the equation. so the domain of the function is kx so if k ranges from -infinity to infinity then you need a +- before the integral?
 
Last edited:
It's just an example for pretty unclear notation. I guess the formula is an attempt to prove the equation
\delta(k x)=\frac{1}{|k|} \delta(k x).
Of course you have to assume that k \neq 0. Otherwise the equation doesn't make any sense to begin with.

Then you have to just do the substitution y=k x in the integral with the distribution times an arbitrary test function to prove this formula. For k&gt;0 you find
\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x f(x) \delta(k x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d}y \frac{1}{k} f(y/k) \delta(y)=\frac{1}{k} f(0).
For k&lt;0 you have
\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x f(x) \delta(k x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} y \left (-\frac{1}{k} \right ) f(y/k) \delta (y)=-\frac{1}{k} f(0).
On the other hand the distribution
\frac{1}{|k|} \delta(x)
has the same outcome under an integral with an arbitrary test function, which proves the above statement about the Dirac distribution.

You can generalize this for arbitrary function y(x) which have only single-order zeros, i.e., y(x_k)=0 but y&#039;(x_k) \neq 0 for k \in \{1,\ldots,n\}. Then you can prove in pretty much the same way as the above example
\delta[y(x)]=\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{|y&#039;(x_k)|} \delta(x-x_k).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
f(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{R}e^{ipx}\left ( \int_{R}f(\alpha)d\alpha \right )dp=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{R}\left (\int_{R}e^{ipx}e^{-ip\alpha}\right)f(\alpha)d\alpha= \int_{R}\delta (x-\alpha)f(\alpha)d\alpha. where,\delta(x-a)=\int_{R}e^{ip(x-\alpha)}\left dp. [/tex]as you know Cauchy expressed Fourier&#039;s integral as exponentials and the delta distribution can be expressed in this way (he also pointed out that the integrals are non-commutative in some circumstances). In modern times there is L Schwartz&#039;s theory of distributions. Dirac called it the delta function because he used it as a continuous analogue of the discrete Kronecker delta.<br /> Here is a vast generalization of the fundamental theorem of algebra
 

Attachments

Last edited:
(x+y)^{N+1}=_{0}^{N+1}\textrm{C}x^{N+1}+\sum_{k=1}^{N}(_{k}^{N}\textrm{C}+_{k-1}^{N}\textrm{C})x^{N+1-k}y^{k}+_{N+1}^{N+1}\textrm{C}y^{N+1}=_{0}^{N+1}\textrm{C}x^{N+1}+\sum_{k=1}^{N}_{k}^{N+1}\textrm{C}x^{(N+1)-k}y^{k}+_{N+1}^{N+1}\textrm{C}y^{N+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{N+1}_{k}^{N+1}{C}x^{(N+1)-k}y^{k}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
956
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K