Why can we differentiate this entropy total derivative with repect to Temperature?

  • Context: Chemistry 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical treatment of entropy in thermodynamics, specifically how the total derivative of entropy can be differentiated with respect to temperature while holding volume constant. Participants explore the implications of this differentiation and the underlying calculus involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the relationship between internal energy, entropy, and volume, leading to an expression for the partial derivative of entropy with respect to temperature at constant volume.
  • Another participant argues against differentiating the total derivative of entropy directly, suggesting instead to use the differential of entropy expressed in terms of temperature and volume.
  • A third participant shares a method from a thermodynamics textbook, detailing the steps to relate changes in internal energy to changes in entropy while holding volume constant, ultimately arriving at the same expression for the partial derivative of entropy.
  • Some participants discuss the adequacy of thermodynamics textbooks in explaining the calculus involved, with one suggesting that a review of partial differential equations might be necessary for better understanding.
  • Another participant highlights a distinction between thermodynamic notation and mathematical notation, emphasizing the need to specify variables when dealing with partial derivatives in thermodynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the clarity of thermodynamics textbooks and the appropriate methods for differentiating entropy. There is no consensus on the best approach to understanding the mathematical treatment of entropy in this context.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential limitations in the explanations provided by thermodynamics textbooks and the need for careful attention to variable dependencies in thermodynamic functions.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
I am going through a thermodynamics course and there is a section about natural variables.
Relevant Equations
In that section, there is the following derivation
Ignoring chemical potential for now, the natural variables of ##U## are ##S## and ##V##. Thus

$$dU=\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial S}\right )_VdS+\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right )_SdV=TdS-pdV\tag{1}$$

which we can rewrite for ##dS## as

$$dS=\frac{dU}{dT}+\frac{pdV}{T}\tag{2}$$

We wish to determine how the entropy depends on temperature.

We can differentiate the expression for ##dS## with respect to temperature at constant volume to obtain ##\left (\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right )_V##.

Apply the derivative to obtain

$$\left (\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right )_V=\frac{1}{T}\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right )_V+\frac{p}{T}\left (\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right )_V$$

$$=\frac{1}{T}\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right )_V=\frac{C_V}{T}$$

Mathematically, what is happening exactly?

In other words, why/how does ##dS## become ##\left (\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right )_V##?

Here is my current understanding.

##dS## is the total derivative function for ##S(T,V)##.

##dS## is a linear function of ##dT## and ##dV## and this linear function is a function of ##T## and ##V##.

That is, at each ##T## and ##V## we have a different function ##dS##.

If we differentiate ##dS## relative to ##T## we are determining the rate of change of ##dS## relative to ##T## at fixed ##V##.

Notation-wise, it seems we would have ##\frac{\partial (dS)}{\partial T}##, which is a notation I have never seen before.

If this is correct so far, then it seems that ##\frac{\partial (dS)}{\partial T}## is written as just ##\left (\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right )_V##.

But this latter step isn't very clear to me.

So my question is essentially how to understand what is going on from a mathematical perspective in this derivation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, don't differentiate dS, rather use the differential of S with variables T and V, ## dS(T,V)=\left(\partial S/\partial T\right)_V dT + \left (\partial S /\partial V\right)_T dV## and a similar expression for dU(T,V).
 
I am working through quite a bit of Thermodynamics myself lately, and the impression I get is that the Thermo books aren't doing a great job with explaining the "calculus" of how these things work. As luck would have it, I asked a similar question today.

There is probably more than one way to go about this, but here is a method following "Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics" (Elliot and Lira). I think all the steps below are using calculus as you are expecting to find it.

dU = TdS - PdV (Fundamental Property relation).

dU = (dU/dT_V)*dT + (dU/dT_V)*dV (the righthand side are partials with respect to T (constant V) and V (constant T), respectively.). Here we are just taking an exact differential of U with respect to T and V.

To find dS in relation to dT, we hold V constant (dV = 0). From the first equation, this let's us relate dU to dS.

dU = TdS and dU = (dU/dT_V)*dT at constant V. We can therefore set these expressions equal to each other.

TdS = (dU/dT_V)*dT. But dU/dT_V is Cv by definition.

dS = (Cv*dT)/T at constant V.

And lastly, we can also right:
dS = (dS/dT_V)*dT + (dS/dV_T)*dV (again these are partials). And we then hold volume constant, dV = 0.
dS = (dS/dT_V)*dT

We can now equate our expressions for dS.

(dS/dT_V)*dT = (Cv/T)*dT with both partials at constant V. This expression allows us to write the following.
(dS/dT_V) = (Cv/T)

For completeness, I will also provide a link to the following which is more in line with guidance on explanation for the mathematical manipulation given in your question: Divide-Through Rule.
 
In my judgment, the thernodynamics books do a fine job of representing the differential changes in thermodynamic functions in terms of partial derivatives, fully consistent with how partial differentiation is done in mathematics books. Perhaps you need to review the subject of partial differential equations in your math books first before judging the thermodynamics books as "not doing a great job."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy, ChemEng and Lord Jestocost
That's fair.
 
Chestermiller said:
In my judgment, the thernodynamics books do a fine job of representing the differential changes in thermodynamic functions in terms of partial derivatives, fully consistent with how partial differentiation is done in mathematics books. "
When I was taught partial derivatives, my prof pointed out to us that there actually is an important difference between thermodynamic notation and mathematical notation: Specifically, we designate for example internal energy always with the letter "U" irrespective whether we assume it to depend on V and S or on p and T, while, for a mathematician U(V,S) And U(p,T) are clearly different functions. While this makes sense physically, it leads to the need to allways specify these variables, i.e. we have to write ##\partial U/\partial S| _V## , i.e., the variable which is held constant, has always to be made explicit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K