MHB Why can't I apply L'Hopital's rule to all indeterminate forms?

AI Thread Summary
L'Hôpital's rule cannot be applied to all indeterminate forms, as demonstrated in the example of the limit as x approaches 3 for the expression (x^4 - 81)/(2x^2 - 5x - 3). In this case, applying the rule incorrectly led to an answer of 9, while the correct limit is 108/7. The discussion highlights that both the numerator and denominator can be factored to simplify the evaluation without needing L'Hôpital's rule. Recognizing the common factor of (x - 3) in both polynomials allows for easier computation. Ultimately, proper simplification is crucial for accurately resolving limits in indeterminate forms.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I have a certain set of problems (i.e. https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/limcondirectory/LimitConstant.html), where many problems are in an indeterminate form ($\frac{0}{0}$) but if we apply L'Hopital's rule it yields an incorrect answer. Instead, I have to simplify the expression and then evaluate the expression like normal.

For example, $$\lim_{{x}\to{3}} \frac{x^4 - 81}{2x^2 - 5x - 3}$$.

If I apply l'hopital's rule, I get $\frac{x^3}{x} = 9$ but this is the wrong answer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tmt said:
I have a certain set of problems (i.e. https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/limcondirectory/LimitConstant.html), where many problems are in an indeterminate form ($\frac{0}{0}$) but if we apply L'Hopital's rule it yields an incorrect answer. Instead, I have to simplify the expression and then evaluate the expression like normal.

For example, $$\lim_{{x}\to{3}} \frac{x^4 - 81}{2x^2 - 5x - 3}$$.

If I apply l'hopital's rule, I get $\frac{x^3}{x} = 9$ but this is the wrong answer.

Hi tmt! ;)

Applying L'Hôpital's rule I'm getting:
$$\lim_{{x}\to{3}} \frac{x^4 - 81}{2x^2 - 5x - 3}
= \lim_{{x}\to{3}} \frac{4x^3}{4x - 5}
= \frac{4\cdot 3^3}{4\cdot 3 - 5}
= \frac{108}{7}
$$
 
Applying L'Hopital's rule, that is, differentiating numerator and denominator separately, we have [math]\frac{4x^3}{4x- 5}[/math], not "[math]\frac{x^3}{x}[/math]. It looks like you forgot the "-5" in the derivative of the denominator.

Added later: for a problem like this, you don't really need to apply "L'Hopital's rule". Since numerator and denominator are polynomials that are equal to 0 when x= 3, it follows immediately that both have a factor of x- 3. x^4- 81= (x^2- 9)(x^2+ 9)= (x- 3)(x+ 3)(x^3+ 9). 2x^2- 5x- 3= (2x+ 1)(x- 3). (Knowing that x- 3 is a factor makes that a lot easier to factor.)

So, for x not equal to 3, \frac{x^2- 81}{x^2- 5x- 3}=\frac{(x- 3)(x+ 3)(x^2+ 9)}{(x- 3)(2x+ 1)}= \frac{(x+ 3)(x^2+ 9)}{2x+ 1} and so \lim_{x\to 3}\frac{x^2- 81}{x^2- 5x- 3}= \lim_{x\to 3} \frac{(x+ 3)(x^2+ 9)}{2x+ 1}= \frac{(3+ 3)(9+ 9)}{ 6+ 1}= \frac{108}{7}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top