I Why can’t photons “pile up” to eject an electron?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kostik
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the photoelectric effect, which demonstrates that light below a certain frequency cannot ionize an atom regardless of intensity. Einstein's 1905 explanation posits that photons, as particles with energy tied to frequency, cannot combine their energies in typical scenarios to achieve ionization. Although multi-photon absorption could theoretically occur under extreme conditions, it is less efficient due to higher-order perturbative effects. The conversation also touches on the practicality of using shorter wavelength lasers for ionization, as they are more cost-effective and straightforward than relying on complex multi-photon processes. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards simpler solutions for achieving ionization rather than pursuing multi-photon absorption methods.
Kostik
Messages
274
Reaction score
32
TL;DR
Why doesn’t the bosonic character of photons prevent the photoelectric effect?
The photoelectric effect is essentially the observation that light below a certain frequency cannot ionize an atom, no matter how large its intensity. Einstein explained this in 1905 by postulating that light consists of particles (photons) with energy proportional to their frequency.

However, photons are bosons (spin-1) and therefore any number of photons can occupy the same quantum state. Therefore, in very high intensity light, it seems plausible that two or more photons in the same state can combine their energies to ionize an atom.

Apparently, this is not the case, as the photoelectric effect makes clear. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A multi-photon absorption might happen I think under extreme conditions like a strong laser.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE, Demystifier, gentzen and 1 other person
If you draw the Feynman diagrams for absorption of one and two photons, you see that they have one and two vertices, respectively, so the latter is suppressed because it is a higher order in the perturbative expansion in ##\alpha##.
 
  • Like
Likes Sambuco and bhobba
Multiphoton imaging is a well established tool. Here's a review for GI docs, for example.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3218135/

If you can use this to reach higher excited states I'm sure you could ionize an atom too. But I don't see why you would want to. Just use a shorter wavelength laser, they're cheaper, easier.
 
  • Like
Likes willyengland
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...