Why Can't the Power Rule Be Used for the Derivative of Velocity Squared?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies why the power rule cannot be directly applied to the derivative of velocity squared, specifically in the context of the equation \(\frac{dT}{dt} = F\dot v\). When substituting kinetic energy \(T\) with \(\frac{1}{2}mv^2\), the product rule must be used due to the dependency of velocity \(v\) on time \(t\). The correct differentiation involves the chain rule, leading to the expression \(\frac{d(v(t))^2}{dt} = 2v \cdot v'(t)\), where \(v'(t)\) represents acceleration \(a(t)\). This method ensures accurate results when calculating forces in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation techniques.
  • Familiarity with the chain rule and product rule in calculus.
  • Basic knowledge of physics concepts such as kinetic energy and force.
  • Ability to work with functions of time, particularly velocity as a function of time.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in calculus, focusing on composite functions.
  • Explore the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in Newton's laws of motion.
  • Learn about vector calculus, particularly how to differentiate vector functions.
  • Investigate the derivation of kinetic energy and its implications in classical mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and mathematics, particularly those studying mechanics and calculus, as well as educators seeking to clarify differentiation techniques in the context of physical applications.

sin2beta
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This really isn't a specific homework problem. It is just something that I've never actually known the reason for. An example is in the derivation of:

\frac{dT}{dt} = F\dot v [\tex]<br /> <br /> In order to arrive at it, I replace T with 1/2mv^2[\tex] and assume m is constant and then I have to do the product rule on v^2 and I&amp;#039;m never sure why I can&amp;#039;t use the power rule. Any explanation is appreciated. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; On a side note, this makes sense to me when I substitute momentum in for one of the velocities and then do the product rule. I just don&amp;#039;t understand why I can&amp;#039;t leave it as velocity and use the power rule. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, v = v(t) is a function of t, and you are differentiating with respect to t.
So when you differentiate v(t)^2 you use the chain rule with u = v(t) and get
\frac{d(v(t))^2}{dt} = \frac{du}{dv} \frac{dv(t)}{dt} = (2v) (v&#039;(t))
where du/dv = d(v^2)/dv = 2 v, just like differentiating
(x^2 + 6)^2
with respect to x first gives you 2(x^2 + 6) by the power rule and then another factor of 2x because of the chain rule.

So, using v'(t) = a(t), and F = m v(t)
\frac{dT}{dt} = \frac12 m (2 v a) = m v a = F v
[If you want to treat v(t) as a vector, you need to be a little more careful as you will get some dot products]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
629
Replies
5
Views
930
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K