Why can't there be a center of relativistic mass?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of the center of momentum frame in relation to massless particles and their relativistic mass. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these concepts within the framework of special relativity, particularly questioning why a system of one massless particle cannot possess a center of momentum frame despite having relativistic mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why a system of one massless particle cannot have a center of momentum frame if it possesses relativistic mass.
  • Another participant clarifies that the center of momentum frames are well-defined in special relativity but may not exist for systems of massless particles, particularly when considering a single massless particle.
  • It is noted that the four-momentum of a massless particle is lightlike, while the four-momentum in the center of momentum frame is timelike, leading to the assertion that no Lorentz transformation can convert a lightlike vector into a timelike one.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the nature of massless particles and their movement, confirming that all massless particles must travel at the speed of light and follow lightlike paths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the relationship between massless particles and center of momentum frames. There is no consensus on the implications of relativistic mass in this context, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining the center of momentum frame for massless particles and the distinctions between mass and relativistic mass, as well as the implications of four-momentum in special relativity.

consal
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
As the title. More specifically, with respect to the center of momentum frames massless particles don't have, why not if they still do have relativistic mass?

(Bracing for an easy answer to a stupid question...) :redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to physics forums.

Well, there is an issue understanding the question. Your title asks about center of mass, your words talk about center of momentum frame. These are closely related, but not the same, and you don't ask a specific question. The following might be helpful.

In special relativity, center of momentum frames are perfectly well defined and very useful (but they may not always exist, see below). Massless particles have momentum, and they definitely contribute to what is the center of momentum frame.

Are you questioning what is the center of momentum for a system of one massless particle? In this case, there is, indeed, none. More generally, a system of massless particles moving parallel has no center of momentum frame. Any other case does (even two photons at a slight angle to each other has a center of momentum frame).

As for center of mass, this concept is simple in special relativity, but complex in general relativity. I am not sure if there is any universally accepted definition in general relativity (several have been proposed, I don't know current consensus on them).
 
Well, yes, I'm mainly asking why a system of one massless particle cannot have a center of momentum frame if it has relativistic mass. What is inherent about invariable mass that it precludes the ability to have a center of momentum frame whereas relativistic mass cannot?
 
Hi consal, welcome to PF!

Since you are talking about the center of momentum frame I am going to assume that you know about four-vectors and the Minkowski norm. The four-momentum in the CoM frame is, by definition, timelike, and the four-momentum of a massless particle is, by definition, lightlike. There is no Lorentz transform which can transform a lightlike vector into a timelike one.
 
DaleSpam said:
Hi consal, welcome to PF!

Since you are talking about the center of momentum frame I am going to assume that you know about four-vectors and the Minkowski norm. The four-momentum in the CoM frame is, by definition, timelike, and the four-momentum of a massless particle is, by definition, lightlike. There is no Lorentz transform which can transform a lightlike vector into a timelike one.

Oh right. Thanks!

edit

Wait, there is no massless particle that has time-like intervals?
 
consal said:
Oh right. Thanks!

edit

Wait, there is no massless particle that has time-like intervals?

No, all massless particles must move at c, and follow a light like path.
 
Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
11K