Why Can't Two Fermions Occupy the Same Quantum State?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the Pauli Exclusion Principle and its implications for fermions and their ability to occupy the same quantum state. Participants explore the conditions under which fermions can overlap in position and the differences between fermions and bosons, particularly in the context of particle interactions and states of matter like Bose-Einstein condensates and superfluidity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why two objects, such as a quark and an electron, cannot merge, suggesting that the Pauli Exclusion Principle applies only to identical fermions.
  • Others clarify that the Pauli Exclusion Principle states that no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state, which is not the same as occupying the same position.
  • A participant points out that while fermions cannot occupy the same quantum state, bosons can, and this distinction is crucial in understanding their behavior.
  • There is a discussion about the example of helium atoms, where two electrons can occupy the same spatial position but have different spins, thus satisfying the exclusion principle.
  • Some participants express fascination with the implications of these principles, particularly in relation to superfluidity in helium-4 and the contrasting behavior of helium-3.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic tenets of the Pauli Exclusion Principle but debate the nuances of its application, particularly regarding non-identical fermions and the implications for particle interactions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the merging of different types of particles.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of quantum states versus positions, and the implications of particle identity on the exclusion principle. Some assumptions about the nature of hypothetical universes without charge are also present but not fully explored.

riz
So my question is why can't 2 object be at the exact same potion, (i.e. overlap). Why can't a +ve quark and electron just merge. In an universe where there is no force caused due to charge, why can't we just walk through a solid wall.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
riz said:
So my question is why can't 2 object be at the exact same potion, (i.e. overlap). Why can't a +ve quark and electron just merge.
The Pauli Exclusion Principle says that no two fermions (a type of particle) can have the same quantum state. You can think of that very (very!) loosely as saying that no two identical fermions can occupy the same position.

Since a quark and an electron are not identical particles, the exclusion principle has nothing to say (so far as I know) about their ability to merge.

Also, the exclusion principle only applies to fermions. There are other particles called bosons, that can occupy the same position. You might be interested to read about Bose-Einstein condensates, that are an instance of this sort of thing.
In an universe where there is no force caused due to charge, why can't we just walk through a solid wall.
A universe without charge would be different from this one, and operate under different laws. So this question is about science fiction. I imagine one could make up a set of laws for a universe in which it is possible to walk through a wall.
 
andrewkirk said:
The Pauli Exclusion Principle says that no two fermions (a type of particle) can have the same quantum state. You can think of that very (very!) loosely as saying that no two identical fermions can occupy the same position.

Since a quark and an electron are not identical particles, the exclusion principle has nothing to say (so far as I know) about their ability to merge.

isn't the ability "to merge" the very different behavior of bosons? Why do you say "loosely as saying that no two identical fermions can occupy the same position." I thought that was the whole other side of physics we can see the effects of. Bosons can, and Fermions can't isn't "loose".

You seem to suggest non-composite fermions can be in the same place at the same time; if they are say, a quark and a lepton...??

I just found out about this super odd physics through reading about helium 4 condensate, next to first hearing about the time travel implication of c, this is the coolest and most bizarre thing about physics.
 
Last edited:
Pauli exclusion principle says 'no two fermions can be in the same quantum state'. Quantum state is not the same as position.
Take helium atom, for instance. It has two electrons in the 1s state. That is, their spatial wave functions are identical and truly, they are in the same space at the same time but not in the same quantum state: their spins are different.
Pauli exclusion principle applies to the fermions of the same species, regardless if they are non-composite or not.
Take again helium as an example. It has two isotopes: Helium 3 and Helium 4. Helium 4 has 2 neutrons, 2 protons and 2 electrons - an even number of 1/2 spin particle, so the total spin has to be a multiple of 1 - hence it is a boson and does condense into a superfluid.
Helium 3 had only 1 neutron, hence an odd number of 1/2 spin particle and it is a fermion. It does not become superfluid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K