Why can't we define a time related operator?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Time
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
30 replies · 6K views
strangerep said:
I was under the impression that unparticles are still a speculative line of research. Is this no longer the case?

This requires a more extensive response/discussion, which might be off-topic (or at the wrong level) for this thread. Do you already have an old thread for these papers which could be reactivated, or should we start a new one?
Unparticles are indeed speculative, in the sense that there is no evidence that they exist in nature. But they are a consistent theoretical concept demonstrating that some features we are not used to are possible at least in principle.

Concerning the other topic, you may start a new thread and I will be happy to contribute to it.