Why can't we name this compound as 4-ethyl-5-methyloctane?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The correct IUPAC name for the compound in question is 5-ethyl-4-methyloctane, not 4-ethyl-5-methyloctane. This naming convention is dictated by the alphabetical order of substituents, where "ethyl" precedes "methyl," resulting in a lower number for "ethyl." While both names may refer to the same molecule, adherence to IUPAC nomenclature is essential for clarity in chemical communication.

PREREQUISITES
  • IUPAC nomenclature rules
  • Understanding of organic compound structure
  • Familiarity with substituent naming conventions
  • Knowledge of octane as a parent hydrocarbon
NEXT STEPS
  • Study IUPAC naming conventions for organic compounds
  • Learn about the significance of substituent order in chemical nomenclature
  • Explore examples of complex organic compounds and their correct names
  • Review the structure and properties of octane and its derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and professionals involved in chemical research or education will benefit from this discussion.

physicsmaths1613
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
5-ethyl-4-methyloctane. Why can't we name this compound as
4-ethyl-5-methyloctane?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Practically, it makes no difference. Any chemist would know what molecule you're referring to. Technically (and I mean that in the worst possible way) the correct name according to IUPAC rules is 4-ethyl-5-methyloctane, because "ethyl" comes before "methyl" alphabetically, so "ethyl" gets a lower number assigned to it than "methyl".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicsmaths1613

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K